Volatility Farm
Reports Calendar Regimes Performance Method About
Volatility Farm
Company report · post release · short-term view
PENG · NASDAQ · Information Technology · AI Infrastructure & Memory

Penguin's raised guide is real, but a 24% run-up, three-times market beta and negative cash flow make the month a test of whether the gap holds

Q4 FY26 sales grew 68% to $566.7M and non-GAAP EPS of $1.00 beat the $0.77 consensus by 30%. FY27 sales guidance was raised to $2.43B (+40%) from $2.17B. The stock traded about 5% higher after hours. But it had already risen 24% in 30 sessions and 11.6% on 2 October alone, gross margin fell 210 bps, and operating cash flow was −$151.9M for the year as receivables and inventory tripled. Over the next 10–30 days the gain holds only if post-print target raises and the late-October memory and AI-server prints confirm demand before the July pattern repeats: +25% on the print, then −28% in 21 sessions.

Close 6 Oct 2026
$64.21
30 day
▲ 24.1%
Year to date
▲ 228.3%
From 52W high
▼ 21.1%
Ann. volatility (30d)
69.3%
Regime as of
6 Oct
Market cap
$3.29B
52W range
$16.24–81.39
TTM revenue
$1.73B
Rev growth
+68% Q4 YoY
P/S TTM
1.90×
P/E TTM
24.7× (adj 22.4×)
Report date
6 Oct 2026
TTM EPS
$2.60 (adj $2.87)
EV/EBITDA
~13.5×
FY27 sales guide
$2.43B (+40%)
Short interest
19.7% of float
Net debt
−$0.14B
Employees
~2,900
Next catalyst
Late Oct
PENG · 30-day price
PENG · 1-year price
00Executive Summary
DimensionFindingSignal
Price action+24.1% in 30 sessions into the print, including +11.6% on 2 Oct. 6 Oct volume was 15.4M shares, 7.8× the 30-day average. About +5% after hours on the release (~$67.50). Still −21.1% from the $81.39 high of 9 Jul; +228% YTD from $19.56.Mixed
Revenue growthQ4 sales $566.7M, +68% YoY and +18% QoQ, after +48% in Q3. FY26 $1,731.5M (+26%), with the second half +58%. FY27 guide raised to $2.43B (+40% ±10%) from $2.17B: Advanced Computing ~+40%, Memory ~+50%.Bullish
ProfitabilityNon-GAAP gross margin 28.8% against 30.9% a year ago (−210 bps) as lower-margin memory grew to 60% of sales. FY26 GAAP operating margin 9.6%, the lowest in the peer set. FY27 gross margin guide 28% ±2.Bearish
Valuation vs peers14.4× FY27 non-GAAP EPS guide ($4.45) against a 17.4× peer forward median. P/S 1.90× against 2.32×. EV/adj. EBITDA ~13.5× against 18.3×. PEG 0.41 on the guided EPS growth.Bullish
Platform KPIsIntegrated Memory $340.8M (+158%). Advanced Computing $154.0M (+11%), with non-hyperscale AI +99%. Optimized LED $71.9M (−7%). Growth is concentrated in memory, where price is a large part of the move.Mixed
Balance sheetCash $647.2M against $788.9M of debt (net debt $142M) after a $750M 0% convertible due 2031. FY26 operating cash flow −$151.9M against $180.6M of GAAP net income. Receivables +159% to $796M, inventory +193% to $749M.Bearish
Regime stateQ2 Volatile Chop on the boundary: Persistency −0.0089, within 0.05 of zero, and Volatility +0.160. Held 11 sessions since leaving Volatile Trend on 22 Sep. As of 6 Oct 2026 (1 trading day lag).Neutral
Driver exposure83.5% idiosyncratic on the drivers, but the one-year beta to the S&P 500 is 3.35 (correlation 0.52) and the correlation with the technology sector fund is 0.65. A 3% index pullback maps to about −10% for PENG. As of 6 Oct 2026.Bearish
Key risk (next 10–30 days)A repeat of July: +25.1% on the Q3 print, then −28.3% over the next 21 sessions. With 19.7% of float short, covering can inflate the first day and then fade. A softer memory-price read from SK hynix or Samsung in late October would hit the segment that is now 60% of sales.Bearish
Catalysts in windowPost-print target resets (7–9 Oct, just before). SK hynix and Samsung Q3 results and DRAM contract prices (late Oct), hyperscaler capex prints (late Oct), FOMC 27–28 Oct, SMCI and AMD results (~early Nov), all expected. The 10-K with full cash-flow detail is due by early Nov. PENG's next report (~early Jan) is outside.Mixed
Overall view (10–30 days)Mixed. Strong print, crowded entry. The fundamentals improved: growth accelerated, the guide went up and the stock is cheap on forward earnings. The entry did not improve: the run-up, short interest and a 3.35 market beta make the path volatile, and cash conversion is poor. 10 of 14 market groups sit in regimes where PENG has had a positive Sharpe. Composite 6.8 / 10. Mixed

Signal reflects the 10–30 day window only (17 Oct – 6 Nov 2026). Row tint matches the badge. Regime and driver readings as of 6 Oct 2026, 1 trading day behind the report date; market regimes as of 5 Oct 2026, 2 trading days behind.

The quarter was the best in the company's recent history and the outlook went up. The question for the next month is not whether the business is growing but how much of it was bought in the 30 sessions before the print, and whether the memory cycle that drives most of the growth stays firm through late-October data.

01Investment Thesis

Each case states what would have to happen inside the next 10–30 days for it to play out. This section argues; the verdict is in section 02.

Bull case
Growth is accelerating, not peaking. +48% in Q3 and +68% in Q4, and the FY27 guide was raised 12% to $2.43B within one quarter. Management guides both large segments to grow 40–50%.
Cheap on its own guide. At $64.21 the stock trades at 14.4× the $4.45 FY27 non-GAAP EPS midpoint, below the 17.4× peer forward median and well below the 20× of NetApp and Dell.
Targets sit above the price. The $80 median and $85 high imply +25% and +32%. In July, four brokers raised targets within two days of the print (to $75–85).
Short fuel. 19.7% of float short into a beat-and-raise can force covering over several sessions, not just one.
Regime map is mostly supportive. 10 of 14 market groups sit in regimes where PENG has had a positive Sharpe. Technology is in Quiet Range (Sharpe 1.12, PENG's second-best tech regime).
What must happen in the window: targets move to $85–95, SK hynix and Samsung confirm firm DRAM pricing, and PENG holds above the $61 gap level from 2 Oct.
Neutral case
Much of the beat was priced in advance. The stock rose from $51.76 to $64.21 in 30 sessions, and the 2 Oct jump came before any news from the company. A 5% after-hours move is small against that run.
No quarterly guide. The company gives only an annual outlook, so the street has no Q1 number to anchor on. The ±10% growth band on FY27 ($2.19–2.67B) is wide.
The regime is provisional. Persistency −0.0089 sits on the axis. Over the year, 21-day forward medians from Volatile Chop (−1.0%) and Volatile Trend (+0.7%) were close to the unconditional +0.4%.
Peers have run too. HPE +35.5%, NetApp +23.1% and Dell +9.5% over the same 30 days. PENG has kept pace with the AI-infrastructure trade rather than outrun it.
What must happen in the window: target raises are matched by Barclays-style caution, memory data is in line, and PENG trades $58–72.
Bear case
The July precedent. After the Q3 print the stock gained 25.1% on 4.3× volume, then fell 28.3% over the next 21 sessions. The setup now (run-up, high short interest) is similar.
Growth is consuming cash. FY26 operating cash flow was −$151.9M. Receivables rose $488M and inventory $494M in a year. Q4 net income of $93.2M exceeded operating income of $69.5M, so non-operating or tax items carried part of the GAAP beat.
Mix is diluting margins. Memory (+158%) carries lower margins than Advanced Computing (+11%). Non-GAAP gross margin fell 210 bps, and the FY27 guide (28% ±2) allows a further decline.
High market beta. One-year beta of 3.35 to the S&P 500. Any risk-off move around the 27–28 Oct FOMC or the hyperscaler prints is amplified.
Insiders have only sold. All open-market Form 4 activity since May 2026 is sales (about $3.0M across nine filings, May–Aug), with no purchases.
What must happen in the window: the after-hours gain fades, memory pricing commentary softens, and PENG refills toward $55 (the 1 Oct close).
Penguin delivered the quarter the market wanted. The market had already moved 24% to meet it, and the cash flow statement says the growth is not yet paying for itself.
02Composite Assessment
The finding: over the next 10–30 days Penguin's beat-and-raise holds only if post-print target raises and the late-October memory prints confirm the cycle. Growth (+68%) and forward valuation (14.4×) are strong. A 24% run-up, 19.7% short interest, a 3.35 market beta and −$152M of operating cash flow make a July-style fade toward $55 a live risk.

2.1 — Dimension scores

Revenue Growth
9.0
+68% Q4, 2nd of 5 vs peers; FY27 guide +40%, raised 12%
Profitability
5.5
9.6% GAAP op margin (5th of 5); non-GAAP GM −210 bps
Valuation
8.0
14.4× FY27 guide vs 17.4× peers; P/S 1.90× vs 2.32×
Earnings Quality
4.5
OCF −$152M vs NI +$181M; AR and inventory ~3×; 8/8 EPS beats
Balance Sheet
6.0
Net debt $142M; D/E 1.47; current ratio 1.88; 0% convert to 2031
Competitive Position
6.5
Niche AI-cluster integrator and memory module maker; smallest in set
Structural Risk
4.5
Memory price cycle; customer concentration; LED in decline
Regime Alignment
6.0
6/14 groups in PENG's best regime; US market in its worst
Driver Independence
5.0
83.5% idiosyncratic, but S&P 500 beta 3.35
Composite
6.8
Growth 25 · Valuation 20 · Profitability 18 · Execution 12 · Risk 10 · Regime 10 · Driver independence 5

Green at 8 and above, yellow 6–8, red below 6. Execution quality uses Earnings Quality. Risk management is the average of Balance Sheet and Structural Risk (5.25). Competitive Position is shown for context and carries no weight. Weighted sum: 2.25 + 1.60 + 0.99 + 0.54 + 0.53 + 0.60 + 0.25 = 6.8 (6.76).

2.2 — Where it wins and where it loses

Wins
Beat and raise. Non-GAAP EPS $1.00 against $0.77 (+29.5%). FY27 sales guide $2.43B, up from $2.17B; FY27 non-GAAP EPS $4.45 ±0.70 (+55% at the midpoint).
Acceleration. Quarterly growth went from about −3% in H1 FY26 to +48% and +68% in H2. Sales rose 18% sequentially in Q4.
Non-hyperscale AI demand. Within Advanced Computing, non-hyperscale AI sales grew 99%, a customer base the large server makers serve less directly.
Forward discount to peers. 14.4× forward earnings against SMCI 8.2×, HPE 15.0×, Dell 19.7× and NetApp 20.5×.
Consistent beats. Eight consecutive non-GAAP EPS beats since January 2025, by 12–49%.
Loses
Cash conversion. FY26 operating cash flow −$151.9M against +$109.1M in FY25; free cash flow about −$164M.
Margin mix. Non-GAAP gross margin 28.8% against 30.9%, with memory now 60% of sales.
Lowest operating margin in the set. FY26 GAAP 9.6% against a 13.0% peer median.
Fragile reactions. Average absolute next-day move of 15.1% over the last eight prints, positive only four times. The July 2026 +25.1% gap fully reversed within 21 sessions.
LED shrinking. Optimized LED −7% YoY in Q4, a drag of about 13% of sales.
03Risk Factors

Ordered by what can bite inside the next 10–30 days, not by ultimate severity. Structural risks that cannot resolve inside the window are marked as context.

Live in the window
Post-print fade. After the Q3 print the stock rose 25.1%, then lost 28.3% in 21 sessions. After the FQ4 FY25 print it fell 16.0% and kept falling (−4.7%). The 30-session run-up and 19.7% short interest make a two-way squeeze likely.
Memory pricing data. Integrated Memory was $340.8M of $566.7M in Q4. SK hynix and Samsung Q3 results and end-October DRAM contract prices will be read straight across.
Market beta. One-year beta 3.35 to the S&P 500, and the US market is in Quiet Drift, PENG's worst US regime (Sharpe −0.50). The FOMC on 27–28 Oct and the hyperscaler prints are the obvious shock points.
AI-server read-across. SMCI (~early Nov) and AMD (~early Nov) report at the end of the window. SMCI's last two prints moved its stock +24.5% and +19.0%; a miss would hit the AI-infrastructure basket.
10-K cash-flow detail. The annual filing (due by early Nov) will show the working-capital build in full, including any customer concentration. A large single-customer receivable would sharpen the cash-flow concern.
Structural context
Memory cycle. Module revenue rises and falls with DRAM prices. FY27's +50% memory growth assumes the upcycle holds through 2027.
Scale against giants. Penguin's $3.3B market cap competes for AI-cluster work with Dell ($365B), HPE ($94B) and SMCI ($29B).
Dilution. Q4 diluted shares were 64.0M against 51.2M basic, reflecting the convertible preferred and notes. The FY27 guide assumes 63M.
LED decline. Optimized LED is shrinking and has not been divested.

3.1 — Competitive, macro and financial

RiskCategoryMechanismBites in window?
Post-print fade / squeezeTechnical24% run-up; 19.7% short interest; July precedentYes
Memory price readCompetitive60% of Q4 sales tied to DRAM pricingYes
Market beta / FOMCMacroBeta 3.35; US market in PENG's worst regimeYes
AI-server peer printsCompetitiveSMCI, AMD at the end of the windowPossible
10-K working-capital detailFinancialOCF −$151.9M; receivables +159%Possible
Memory down-cycleCompetitiveModule prices follow DRAMStructural
Scale disadvantageCompetitiveSmallest AI-infrastructure vendor in the setStructural
DilutionFinancial64M diluted vs 51M basic sharesStructural

Nothing on the balance sheet forces a problem inside a month: the $750M convert carries no coupon and runs to 2031. What can hurt PENG in the window is positioning after a 24% run and any wobble in memory pricing or the broad tape, all amplified by a beta above three.

04Earnings & Guidance Signals
+68
%
Q4 sales growth, accelerating from +48% in Q3, with the FY27 guide raised to $2.43B
$566.7M against $337.9M a year earlier. Non-GAAP EPS $1.00 against $0.77 consensus. The stock traded about 5% higher after hours on 6 Oct; the regular-session reaction falls on 7 Oct.

4.1 — Earnings history

QuarterReport DateRevenuevs Est.EPS (dil.)vs Est.Stock Reaction
FQ4 FY26 (Aug-26)6 Oct 2026$566.7Mn/a$1.29 (adj $1.00)+29.5%AH ~+5%
FQ3 FY26 (May-26)7 Jul 2026$478.7Mn/a$0.68 (adj $0.84)+49.3%+25.1%
FQ2 FY26 (Feb-26)1 Apr 2026$343.0Mn/a$0.58 (adj $0.52)+23.1%+13.4%
FQ1 FY26 (Nov-25)6 Jan 2026$343.1Mn/a$0.04 (adj $0.49)+12.3%−13.8%
FQ4 FY25 (Aug-25)7 Oct 2025$337.9Mn/a$0.11 (adj $0.43)+18.5%−16.0%
FQ3 FY25 (May-25)8 Jul 2025$324.3Mn/a−$0.01 (adj $0.47)+45.6%+10.6%

All reports come after the close; the reaction is the next session's close-to-close move. EPS surprise is on non-GAAP EPS against consensus. Revenue consensus was not available for these quarters (n/a). 21-session moves after the next-day close, oldest to newest: −2.5%, −4.7%, +1.1%, +56.6%, −28.3%.

4.2 — Beat consistency

CompanyRev Beat RateEPS Beat RateGuidance
PENGn/c100% (8/8)FY27 raised to $2.43B
PENG (since Jan 2024)—92% (11/12)One miss (Oct 2024)
Peer median (last 4)n/c100%SMCI 3/4; HPE, NTAP, Dell 4/4 known

4.3 — Forward guidance

ItemValueComment
Next report date~early Jan 2027Outside the 10–30 day window
Q1 FY27 guideNoneAnnual outlook only
FY27 net sales$2.43B (+40% ±10%)Raised from $2.17B; range ~$2.19–2.67B
Segment growthAC ~+40% / Memory ~+50%LED not guided
Non-GAAP gross margin28% ±2FY26 29.3%; midpoint implies −130 bps
Non-GAAP opex~$275M ±10%Operating leverage on +40% sales
FY27 EPS$4.45 ±0.70 adj / $3.50 GAAP+55% adj at the midpoint; 63M diluted shares

The next Penguin print is not in the window. The guide raise does lift estimates, so October's move depends on how far analysts lift targets and on outside data (memory prices, AI-server peers), not on new company numbers.

05Analyst Outlook
PeriodSourceViewKey Point
Oct 2026 (pre-print)RosenblattBullishBuy reiterated, $80 target, on 2 Oct; the stock rose 11.6% that day
Jul 2026 (post-Q3)Citizens, Needham, Stifel, RosenblattBullishTargets raised to $85, $80, $75 and $80 within two days of the Q3 print
Jul 2026BarclaysBearishDowngraded to Underweight on 20 Jul at $40, after an April cut to Equal-Weight
May–Jun 2026Rosenblatt, StifelBullishTargets lifted from $24–32 to $54–66 as the AI-memory rerating began
Oct 2026 releaseManagement (CEO Kash Shaikh)Bullish"Our AI Infrastructure business is accelerating further"
Consensus7 analystsBullishBuy; mean target $74.29, median $80, range $40–85

Sources: Yahoo Finance rating log and consensus, MarketBeat, company release (6 Oct 2026), retrieved 7 Oct 2026. Post-print target changes had not yet been published at the time of writing. MarketBeat shows a lower $64.17 mean, which blends older targets.

06Insider & Board Activity
DateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueSignal Read
29 Sep 2026Anthony FreyAward (grant)11,555$0.00—Routine grant; no signal
24 Aug 2026Anne KuykendallSale4,000$49.62–51.34$202.3kRegular seller; mild negative
23 Jul 2026Joseph ClarkSale1,327$57.47$76.3kSmall; no signal
22 Jul 2026Anne KuykendallSale739$56.12$41.5kSmall; no signal
15 Jun 2026Anne KuykendallSale4,000$62.51–65.63$257.5kSold near the highs
1 Jun 2026Joseph ClarkSale10,351$55.53–60.76$609.4kMild negative
12 May 2026Sandeep NayyarSale20,000$43.48–45.09$890.3kLargest 2026 sale
12 May 2026Maximiliane StraubSale12,000$44.34–45.00$537.4kMild negative
FY2026Company (buyback)Repurchasen/dn/d$74.4MSupportive, but small against −$152M OCF

Source: SEC Form 4 via the Yahoo Finance insider feed; buyback from the FY26 release. Roles are not shown because the feed does not carry them. All open-market transactions since May 2026 are sales: $2.6M in the rows listed, plus two smaller May sales (Straub 3,000 shares at $49.00; Clark 5,000 at $39.99), about $3.0M in total. No purchases were filed. The sizes are small relative to the $3.3B market cap.

07Recent News & Catalysts
DateSourceDevelopmentIn window?
~early Jan 2027Penguin (expected)Q1 FY27 results; first quarter against the raised $2.43B guideNo
~early Nov 2026SMCI, AMD (expected)Quarterly results; AI-server and accelerator demand readYes, at the end
By early Nov 2026Penguin 10-K (expected)Annual report with full cash-flow, receivables and customer-concentration detailYes
27–28 Oct 2026Federal ReserveFOMC; the main macro shock point for a 3.35-beta stockYes
~late Oct 2026Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon (expected)Quarterly results and capex guides for AI data centresYes
~late Oct 2026SK hynix, Samsung (expected)Q3 results and memory-pricing commentary; end-October DRAM contract pricesYes
7–9 Oct 2026Sell-side (expected)Post-print target resets; July saw four raises within two daysJust before
7 Oct 2026MarketFirst regular session after the print; after-hours indication ~$67.50 (+5%)Just before
6 Oct 2026Penguin releaseQ4 sales $566.7M (+68%), non-GAAP EPS $1.00; FY27 guide raised to $2.43BNo, sets the base
2 Oct 2026Rosenblatt / marketBuy reiterated at $80; stock +11.6% to $61.36 ahead of the printNo, sets the base

The window is 10–30 days from the 7 Oct 2026 report date (17 Oct – 6 Nov 2026). Items are ordered newest (future) first. Dates marked "expected" follow prior-year patterns and are unconfirmed.

Catalysts inside the window

Mid–late Oct: how far the post-print target resets go, and whether short covering continues. Late Oct: SK hynix and Samsung on memory pricing, the read for 60% of Penguin's sales. Late Oct: hyperscaler capex guides. 27–28 Oct: FOMC. By early Nov: the 10-K's cash-flow detail. Early Nov: SMCI and AMD on AI-server demand.

08Ratings & Price Targets — Peer Frame
CompanyPriceMarket CapTTM RevenueP/S TTMRev Growth (latest Q, YoY)Source ViewNews Sentiment
PENG$64.21$3.29B$1.73B1.90×+67.7%Buy · $74.29Positive
Super Micro (SMCI)$43.46$28.6B$39.06B0.73×+93.2%n/d · $42.38Mixed
HPE$70.48$93.6B$41.87B2.23×+33.7%Buy · $72.03Positive
NetApp (NTAP)$228.45$44.9B$7.39B6.07×+29.9%Buy · $206.06Positive
Dell$574.00$365.0B$151.20B2.41×+57.7%Buy · $585.96Positive
Peer median—$69.2B$40.47B2.32×+45.7%——

Prices at the 6 Oct 2026 close. PENG revenue and growth come from its FY26 release (to 28 Aug 2026); market cap uses 51.2M basic shares (on 64.0M diluted shares it is $4.11B and P/S 2.37×). Peer figures are vendor TTM to Jun–Jul 2026. Source view is the vendor consensus key and mean target; SMCI has no consensus key. HPE and NetApp trade above their mean targets.

8.5Analyst Price Targets — Multiple Sources

Recent analyst actions

Analyst / SourceCurrent TargetPreviousDateImplied ReturnRatingDirection
Rosenblatt$80$802 Oct 2026+24.6%Buy► Reiterated
Barclays$40$4020 Jul 2026−37.7%Underweight (downgrade)▼ Lowered (rating)
Barclays$40$279 Jul 2026−37.7%Equal-Weight▲ Raised
Citizens$85$658 Jul 2026+32.4%Market Outperform▲ Raised
Needham$80$608 Jul 2026+24.6%Buy▲ Raised
Stifel$75$668 Jul 2026+16.8%Buy▲ Raised
Rosenblatt$80$758 Jul 2026+24.6%Buy▲ Raised
Stifel$66$242 Jun 2026+2.8%Buy▲ Raised

Implied return is measured against the $64.21 close on 6 Oct 2026; superseded targets are shown at their own level. Source: Yahoo Finance rating log. Five of the six current targets sit above the price; Barclays at $40 is the outlier. No post-print actions had been published at the time of writing.

MetricValue
Last close$64.21
Consensus target$74.29
Median target$80.00
High target$85.00
Low target$40.00
Implied upside to consensus+15.7%
Implied downside to low−37.7%
Analysts contributing7

Yahoo Finance consensus, 7 Oct 2026. MarketBeat shows a $64.17 mean. Coverage is thin, so one reset moves the mean by several dollars.

Target range vs last close ($64.21)
$40
$74
$80
$85
09Fundamental Financial Analysis — Company Trends & Peer Comparison

9.A — Quarterly earnings trend

QuarterRevenueQoQ ΔYoY ΔEPS (diluted)Gross MarginAdj. EBITDAMarginvs Est.Next-day Reaction
FQ3 FY25 (May-25)$324.3Mn/dn/d−$0.0129.3%$25.3Me7.8%Beat+10.6%
FQ4 FY25 (Aug-25)$337.9M+4.2%n/d$0.1128.6%$22.7Me6.7%Beat−16.0%
FQ1 FY26 (Nov-25)$343.1M+1.5%~−3% (H1)$0.0428.0%$20.7Me6.0%Beat−13.8%
FQ2 FY26 (Feb-26)$343.0M0.0%~−3% (H1)$0.5827.3%$66.4Me19.4%Beat+13.4%
FQ3 FY26 (May-26)$478.7M+39.6%+47.6%$0.6827.8%$66.7Me13.9%Beat+25.1%
FQ4 FY26 (Aug-26)$566.7M+18.4%+67.7%$1.2927.5%$93.0M16.4%BeatAH ~+5%
FY27 guide (annual)$2,430M—+40%$3.50~28% adj——Raised from $2.17B—

FY ends late August. Reports come after the close, so the reaction is the next session. Gross margin is GAAP. Adj. EBITDA marked e is vendor EBITDA on a GAAP basis and includes non-operating items (FQ2 FY26 is lifted by them); only FQ4 FY26 ($93M) is the company's adjusted figure. Year-ago quarters for H1 FY26 were not available individually; H1 FY26 sales of $686.1M were −2.9% against H1 FY25 (derived from the FY25 total).

Revenue $M · own band
GAAP operating margin % · own band

Revenue was flat at about $340M for four quarters, then stepped up to $479M and $567M. GAAP operating margin rose from 3.7% to 12.3% on operating leverage, even as gross margin slipped from 29.3% to 27.5%.

9.1 — Liquidity ratios

Metric28 Aug 202629 Aug 202530 Aug 2024Target / Status
Current ratio1.882.252.651.5–3.0 healthy · passed, but falling
Quick ratio1.211.611.94≥1.0 healthy · passed; cash plus receivables only
Cash ratio0.540.961.17Cash $647.2M against $1,195.9M of current liabilities

FY26 and FY25 from the Q4 FY26 release; FY24 is vendor data. Current liabilities rose 152% in a year as payables funded part of the inventory build.

Peer comparison (most recent reported)Current RatioNet Cash PositionLiquidity Status
PENG (28 Aug 26)1.88−$0.14BAdequate
SMCI (Jun 26)3.87−$1.72BStrong
HPE (Jul 26)1.11−$14.10BLevered
NetApp (Jul 26)1.24+$1.04BAdequate
Dell (Jul 26)0.96−$23.71BLevered
Peer median1.18−$7.91B—

9.2 — Leverage & solvency

Metric28 Aug 202629 Aug 202530 Aug 2024Target / Status
Debt-to-equity1.471.141.83Lower is safer · elevated after the $750M convert
Debt-to-assets0.280.290.49<0.5 conservative · passed
Interest coveragen/d (FY26)~10×~0.6×>2.5 healthy · 0% coupon on the 2031 convert keeps cash interest low
Debt service coveragen/mn/dn/d>1.25 healthy · not meaningful with negative FY26 OCF

Debt: $788.9M (Aug 26; $53.4M current), $461.8M (Aug 25), $717.9M (Aug 24, vendor). Equity is shareholders' equity per the release ($537.2M and $405.5M) and vendor for FY24. FY25 and FY24 coverage are vendor operating income over interest expense; FY26 interest expense was not in the summary release.

9.3 — Profitability ratios

MetricFQ4 FY26TTM (= FY26)FQ4 FY25FY2025FY2024Trend
Gross margin27.5%27.7%28.6%28.8%29.1%▼
Operating margin (GAAP)12.3%9.6%3.7%4.2%1.6%▲ (adj 13.9% vs 12.3%)
Net margin16.4%10.4%2.8%1.9%−4.5%▲
Adj. EBITDA margin16.4%~14.7%e~12.5%e~13.2%en/d▲
Return on assets3.4% (q)8.2%0.6% (q)1.6%−3.5%▲
Return on equity17.3% (q)38.3%2.3% (q)6.4%n/m (loss)▲
DuPont (NPM × AT × EM)—10.4% × 0.79 × 4.66—1.9% × 0.89 × 3.88—Margin-led, with leverage rising

(q) = single quarter, not annualised. FY26 net income $180.6M includes non-operating and tax items (GAAP net income exceeded GAAP operating income in Q4). FY24 figures are vendor data. Adj. EBITDA marked e is non-GAAP operating income plus about $3M a quarter of depreciation (derived from Q4's $93.0M against $89.8M). ROE is lifted by a small equity base: equity multiplier 4.66.

Peer comparisonGrossOp MarginNet MarginAdj. EBITDAROEProfitability Rank
PENG (FY26)27.7%9.6%10.4%~14.7%38.3%5 of 5
SMCI10.8%13.4%5.7%7.2%21.5%2 of 5
HPE36.6%12.6%6.7%16.5%10.9%3 of 5
NetApp70.6%26.7%19.2%28.3%114.8%1 of 5
Dell19.9%12.0%7.5%11.7%n/m4 of 5
Peer median28.3%13.0%7.1%14.1%21.5%—

Peers are vendor TTM to Jun–Jul 2026; vendor operating margins are latest-quarter figures. Rank is by operating margin. Dell's ROE is not meaningful (negative equity); NetApp's reflects a small equity base after buybacks.

9.4 — Efficiency & growth

MetricCurrent / TTMPrior yearComment
Asset turnover0.790.89 (FY25)Working capital grew faster than sales
Revenue per employee~$597kn/dOn ~2,900 employees (vendor)
EPS growth (FY26, GAAP)+829%n/m (FY25 $0.28)Non-GAAP +51% to $2.87
EPS growth (FQ4 YoY, GAAP)+1,073%—Non-GAAP +133% to $1.00
Dividend yield——No dividend; $74.4M of FY26 buybacks
FCF yield−5.0%~+3% (FY25)FY26 FCF about −$164M on the current market cap
CompanyAsset TurnoverRev / EmployeeEmployeesEPS GrowthDiv YieldGrowth Rank
PENG0.79$597k~2,900+133% (adj)—2 of 5
SMCI1.30$5.58M7,000+504%—1 of 5
HPE0.50$625k67,000+405%0.83%4 of 5
NetApp0.67$632k11,700+61%0.93%5 of 5
Dell1.19$1.56M97,000+255%0.46%3 of 5
Peer median0.93$1.10M39,350+330%0.83%—

Growth rank is by latest-quarter YoY revenue growth. Peer asset turnover is TTM revenue over the latest total assets (derived). Peer EPS growth is the vendor's quarterly YoY GAAP figure, which is inflated by depressed year-ago bases across the group.

Platform metrics

MetricFQ4 FY26FQ4 FY25YoYComment
Net sales$566.7M$337.9M+68%+18% QoQ
Integrated Memory$340.8M~$132M+158%60% of sales; FY26 $924.0M
Advanced Computing$154.0M~$139M+11%Non-hyperscale AI +99%; FY26 $558.8M
Optimized LED$71.9M~$77M−7%FY26 $248.7M
Non-GAAP gross margin28.8%30.9%−210 bpsMix shift to memory
Non-GAAP operating income$89.8M$39.2M+129%15.8% margin vs 11.6%
Accounts receivable$796.3M$307.9M+159%Grew more than twice as fast as sales
Inventory$748.8M$255.2M+193%Memory build ahead of FY27 demand
Operating cash flow (FY)−$151.9M+$109.1Mn/mWorking-capital build
Diluted shares (Q4)64.0Mn/d—FY26 average 58.8M vs 54.4M

Year-ago segment figures are approximate (back-solved from the stated growth rates, marked ~). Receivable and inventory growth are coloured as negatives because they consume cash. Some vendor summaries show a positive FY26 operating cash flow; the release's cash-flow statement shows −$151.9M, which is used here.

9.5 — Market valuation multiples

MetricCurrentComment
P/E TTM (GAAP)24.7×22.4× on non-GAAP $2.87; peer median 32.2×
P/E on FY27 guide (non-GAAP $4.45)14.4×18.3× on GAAP $3.50; peer forward median 17.4×
Price / book6.1×Shareholders' equity $537.2M
Price / sales TTM1.90×Peer median 2.32×; 2.37× on diluted shares
EV / adj. EBITDA TTM~13.5×EV ~$3.43B on ~$255M adj. EBITDA (derived); peers 18.3×
PEG0.4122.4× over +55% guided non-GAAP EPS growth
FCF yield / dividend yield−5.0% / —Growth funded by the balance sheet
Price / salesPriceMarket CapTTM RevenueP/S TTMvs Peer Median
PENG$64.21$3.29B$1.73B1.90×−18%
SMCI$43.46$28.6B$39.06B0.73×−69%
HPE$70.48$93.6B$41.87B2.23×−4%
NetApp$228.45$44.9B$7.39B6.07×+162%
Dell$574.00$365.0B$151.20B2.41×+4%
Peer median—$69.2B$40.47B2.32×—
Earnings & growth-adjustedTTM EPSP/E TTMRev GrowthPEGAssessment
PENG$2.6024.7×+67.7%0.41Discount on forward earnings; cash flow is the catch
SMCI$3.2813.3×+93.2%n/dCheapest; thin margins and governance history
HPE$2.0035.2×+33.7%0.50Re-rated on AI servers; above mean target
NetApp$7.0932.2×+29.9%2.14Quality premium; above mean target
Dell$17.8832.1×+57.7%0.65Scale leader in AI servers
Peer median—32.2×+45.7%0.65—

On earnings Penguin is cheaper than every peer except SMCI, and its guided growth is among the fastest. The discount reflects the weakest margins in the group and negative cash flow. Valuation supports the stock in the month; it does not protect it from a positioning unwind.

10Regime Analysis — Persistency & Volatility
−0.009
P
Persistency sits on the axis, leaving PENG in Volatile Chop on the boundary with Volatile Trend
289 daily observations, 13 Aug 2025 – 6 Oct 2026. Volatility +0.160 and rising since 24 Sep. As of 6 Oct 2026, 1 trading day behind the report date. Status: CURRENT.

10.1 — Regime trace

PENG — Regime trace · Persistency vs Volatility (289 daily points, oldest faint → newest bright)
Q1 Volatile trend Q2 Volatile chop Q3 Quiet range Q4 Quiet drift Current (6 Oct)

Persistency on x, Volatility on y. Source: Trader workbook, Individual regimes daily. Window 13 Aug 2025 – 6 Oct 2026, 289 observations (145 plotted after thinning). As of 6 Oct 2026, 1 trading day behind the 7 Oct 2026 report date.

10.2 — Current regime read

MeasureCurrentMeanStd DevMinMaxPercentileInterpretation
Persistency−0.0089−0.11430.1792−0.30090.368368.5Random / Neutral. Crossed below zero on 22 Sep after the summer's trending phase; above its one-year mean
Volatility0.16020.00170.2891−0.49650.500065.4Elevated. Up from +0.054 on 24 Sep; the print is likely to push it higher

Currently in Q2 Volatile Chop, held 11 consecutive sessions. Persistency is within 0.05 of the axis (−0.0089), so the quadrant call is provisional: PENG is on the boundary between Volatile Chop and Volatile Trend. As of 6 Oct 2026, 1 trading day behind.

10.3 — Regime occupancy & transitions

QuadrantLabel% of periodCharacter
Q1Volatile trend26.0%Moves that extend; covered the April–July rally
Q2Volatile chop24.2%Big moves that reverse; the current state
Q3Quiet range49.8%Low-volatility mean reversion; most of late 2025
Q4Quiet drift0.0%Never visited
TransitionCountNote
Quiet range → Volatile chop3Volatility rises before direction forms
Volatile chop → Volatile trend3Moves start to extend
Volatile trend → Volatile chop3Trend stalls; the 22 Sep move
Volatile chop → Quiet range2Volatility fades

Over the year, 21-day forward returns from Volatile Chop had a median of −1.0% and were positive 40% of the time (57 observations; the mean of +10.8% is skewed by April). From Volatile Trend the median was +0.7% (47% positive); from Quiet Range −0.1% (50%). Unconditionally the median was +0.4% (51% positive). As of 6 Oct 2026.

Persistency moves slowly.

The series updates far less often than Volatility and can hold one value for weeks, producing long vertical runs on the trace. That is the data behaving normally. A reading on the axis means recent moves have neither clearly extended nor clearly reversed. With Volatility elevated, the next 10–30 days can resolve either way: a move back into Volatile Trend if the post-print direction holds, or continued chop if it does not. These statistics describe 13 Aug 2025 – 6 Oct 2026 and are not predictions.

11Driver Exposure — Market & Sector Covariation
3.35
β
one-year beta to the S&P 500, even though 83.5% of daily variance is company-specific on the drivers
One-year correlation 0.52 with the S&P 500 and 0.65 with the technology sector fund. Driver regression on Market Driver 1 and Sector Driver 1, 1,253 observations, 8 Oct 2021 – 6 Oct 2026. Drivers as of 6 Oct 2026, 1 trading day behind.

11.1 — Driver correlation table

FactorCorrelationR² (%)Rolling 60d (current)Rolling MinRolling MaxStabilityDirection
Market Driver 1 Primary−0.0020.0−0.189−0.3820.402VariableNeutral
Market Driver 20.0040.0−0.013−0.4250.398VariableNeutral
Market Driver 30.0190.00.127−0.3530.439VariableNeutral
Market Driver 40.0000.00.000−0.3460.311VariableNeutral
Market Driver 5−0.0270.1−0.109−0.3740.301VariableNeutral
Sector Driver 1 Primary−0.40616.5−0.517−0.726−0.190VariableNegative
Sector Driver 2−0.0190.00.417−0.6230.614VariableNeutral
Sector Driver 3−0.0330.10.130−0.3910.459VariableNeutral

Methodology: daily log returns of PENG against first-differenced Market Driver levels and return-scaled Sector Driver values. Full window 8 Oct 2021 – 6 Oct 2026, 1,253 observations; rolling window 60 days. Correlations are not coloured. Sector Driver 1 is the only material link: −0.406 over five years and −0.517 on the current 60-day window, within a −0.726 to −0.190 range that has never turned positive. Drivers as of 6 Oct 2026, 1 trading day behind the report date.

11.2 — Systematic vs idiosyncratic decomposition

Systematic 16.5%
Idiosyncratic 83.5%
FactorRaw BetaStandardised BetaShare of Explained Variance
Market Driver 1 (primary)−0.00002−0.006<0.1%
Sector Driver 1 (primary)−0.46501−0.406>99.9%

The drivers explain little, but the plain market beta is large: over the past year PENG has moved about 3.35 times the S&P 500 on average, with a 0.52 correlation. Its correlations with the AI-hardware peers are moderate (HPE 0.53, SMCI 0.45, Dell 0.40). For the next 10–30 days the broad risk appetite for AI infrastructure matters as much as company news, and any index drawdown will be magnified.

11.3 — Rolling 60-day driver correlation

Market Driver 1 (blue) and Sector Driver 1 (orange) against PENG daily returns, Sep 2024 – Oct 2026. Sector Driver 1 has stayed between about −0.2 and −0.7 throughout and sits near −0.5 now, a stable negative link. Market Driver 1 oscillates around zero and is about −0.15 to −0.19 on the latest readings. As of 6 Oct 2026.

12Performance by Market Regime

PENG daily returns bucketed by each market group's regime quadrant. Window 8 Feb 2022 – 5 Oct 2026, 1,168 overlapping days. No bucket falls below 30 days (the smallest is 69), so none is marked thin. Returns are log returns, so the worst days look larger than simple returns (the −58.78% day is the −44.4% fall of 13 Oct 2023). The statistics describe history, not the future.

12.1 — US market · currently in Q4 Quiet Drift

Market RegimeDays% of PeriodCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeHit RateBest DayWorst Day
Q1 Volatile Trend17014.6%+252.7%+547.7%60.6%9.0457.1%+16.82%−17.29%
Q2 Volatile Chop41435.4%+54.4%+30.3%55.0%0.5551.2%+16.75%−21.42%
Q3 Quiet Range28924.7%−16.3%−14.4%53.3%−0.2745.3%+8.56%−26.75%
Q4 Quiet Drift Current29525.3%−51.0%−45.6%91.6%−0.5050.2%+23.33%−58.78%

12.1b — SP500 · currently in Q4 Quiet Drift

Market RegimeDays% of PeriodCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeHit RateBest DayWorst Day
Q1 Volatile Trend17515.0%+72.0%+118.4%69.0%1.7253.1%+16.82%−17.29%
Q2 Volatile Chop40935.0%+100.3%+53.4%57.5%0.9352.1%+23.33%−21.42%
Q4 Quiet Drift Current23019.7%−18.1%−19.7%94.7%−0.2152.2%+22.42%−58.78%
Q3 Quiet Range35430.3%−20.8%−15.3%51.8%−0.3045.8%+8.56%−26.75%

12.1c — Global market · currently in Q4 Quiet Drift

Market RegimeDays% of PeriodCumulative ReturnAnn. ReturnAnn. VolSharpeHit RateBest DayWorst Day
Q4 Quiet Drift Current24220.7%+113.1%+119.9%61.7%1.9452.5%+23.33%−27.54%
Q1 Volatile Trend14112.1%+49.0%+103.9%99.8%1.0456.0%+16.82%−58.78%
Q2 Volatile Chop44337.9%+52.1%+26.9%57.9%0.4750.3%+16.75%−21.42%
Q3 Quiet Range34229.3%−53.7%−43.3%63.5%−0.6846.5%+22.42%−26.75%

Best row green, worst row red, ranked by Sharpe. Cumulative return is the compounded PENG return across all days spent in that regime. Market regimes as of 5 Oct 2026, 2 trading days behind.

12.2 — Cross-group summary grid

GroupCurrent RegimeBest Regime for PENGWorst RegimeCum. Return in CurrentSharpe in CurrentSharpe SpreadDays in Current
US marketQ4 Quiet DriftQ1 Volatile TrendQ4 Quiet Drift−51.0%−0.509.5422
SP500Q4 Quiet DriftQ1 Volatile TrendQ3 Quiet Range−18.1%−0.212.0222
Global marketQ4 Quiet DriftQ4 Quiet DriftQ3 Quiet Range+113.1%1.942.6216
TechnologyQ3 Quiet RangeQ1 Volatile TrendQ4 Quiet Drift+144.5%1.122.1995
FinancialsQ1 Volatile TrendQ1 Volatile TrendQ3 Quiet Range+76.0%2.313.2610
EnergyQ1 Volatile TrendQ1 Volatile TrendQ4 Quiet Drift+76.8%0.871.4771
UtilitiesQ2 Volatile ChopQ4 Quiet DriftQ2 Volatile Chop−39.7%−0.491.9516
EuropeQ1 Volatile TrendQ1 Volatile TrendQ3 Quiet Range+271.5%4.615.1815
GoldQ2 Volatile ChopQ2 Volatile ChopQ4 Quiet Drift+173.5%1.081.32275
VIX NearQ4 Quiet DriftQ1 Volatile TrendQ2 Volatile Chop+28.4%1.0312.4925
VIX MidQ4 Quiet DriftQ4 Quiet DriftQ1 Volatile Trend+214.3%2.022.45106
Bonds nearQ1 Volatile TrendQ4 Quiet DriftQ3 Quiet Range+76.5%3.1510.9410
Bonds midQ1 Volatile TrendQ4 Quiet DriftQ3 Quiet Range+3.6%0.044.5112
Bonds longQ2 Volatile ChopQ3 Quiet RangeQ1 Volatile Trend−18.3%−0.241.615

All 14 mapped groups. Groups in bold have Sharpe spreads above 1.5, meaning PENG is materially sensitive to that group's regime. Sharpe spread is best-regime Sharpe minus worst-regime Sharpe. Market regimes as of 5 Oct 2026, 2 trading days behind.

12.3 — Sensitivity callouts

Most sensitive to the VIX Near and Bonds near regimes (Sharpe spreads 12.49 and 10.94). Both peaks come from short, extreme buckets (69 and 151 days). VIX Near is in Quiet Drift (Sharpe 1.03, second best); Bonds near is in Volatile Trend (3.15, second best).
What has historically followed the current US market regime over 10–30 days. In the 275 days the US market was in Quiet Drift with a full 21-day window, PENG's 21-day forward return had a median of +2.1% and was positive 55.3% of the time. Unconditionally, the median was +0.4% and positive 50.9% of the time. Quiet Drift is nonetheless PENG's worst US-market regime by Sharpe (−0.50), because it contains the largest down days. This is history, not a forecast.
Mostly a favourable configuration. Six of 14 groups sit in PENG's best regime for that group: Global market (Sharpe 1.94), Energy, Europe (4.61), Financials (2.31), Gold and VIX Mid (2.02). Ten of 14 groups sit in a regime with a positive PENG Sharpe. Technology's Quiet Range (1.12) is PENG's second-best tech regime, with a 21-day forward median of +1.2%.
The exceptions are the US market and Utilities. US market Quiet Drift (−0.50) and Utilities Volatile Chop (−0.49) are PENG's worst regimes for those groups. SP500 Quiet Drift (−0.21) and Bonds long Volatile Chop (−0.24) are also negative. The US exposure matters most, given the 3.35 beta.
Do not trade this table.

Regime-conditional history describes 8 Feb 2022 – 5 Oct 2026, not the future. No regime bucket here holds fewer than 30 days. Where one does, annualised figures should not be relied on. Several Sharpe ratios above 4 come from short buckets that contain a few extreme days. Overlapping forward windows overstate the independence of observations. Market regime series as of 5 Oct 2026, 2 trading days behind the report date.

13News & Market Narrative
DateHeadlineSentiment
6 Oct 26Penguin Q4 sales $566.7M (+68%); non-GAAP EPS $1.00 vs $0.77 consensus (company release, Business Wire)Positive
6 Oct 26FY27 outlook raised to $2.43B sales and $4.45 non-GAAP EPS; Advanced Computing ~+40%, Memory ~+50% (release, call slides)Positive
6 Oct 26Gross margin 28.8% non-GAAP vs 30.9%; FY26 operating cash flow −$151.9M (8-K exhibit)Negative
6 Oct 26Shares trade about 5% higher after hours on the resultsPositive
6 Oct 26Stock closes at $64.21 (+5.8%) on 15.4M shares ahead of the releaseMixed
2 Oct 26Rosenblatt reiterates Buy, $80 target; stock +11.6% to $61.36Positive
Aug 26Insider sales continue (Kuykendall, 4,000 shares at ~$50)Negative
20 Jul 26Barclays downgrades to Underweight, $40 targetNegative
9 Jul 26Stock peaks at $81.39 after the Q3 print, then falls 28% over the next 21 sessionsNegative
8 Jul 26Citizens ($85), Needham ($80), Stifel ($75) and Rosenblatt ($80) raise targets after Q3Positive
7 Jul 26Q3 sales $478.7M (+48%), EPS $0.84 vs $0.56; stock +25.1% next dayPositive
1 Apr 26Q2 beat lifts the stock 13.4% from a $16.24 low (30 Mar); +57% over the following monthPositive

12 rows, newest first. Sources: company release and 8-K, Yahoo Finance rating and insider feeds, MarketBeat; price moves derived from daily closes. The narrative has moved from "subscale memory and LED conglomerate" (early 2026) to "AI-infrastructure growth story" (since April). The July round trip shows how quickly that narrative can be repriced.

14Company Snapshot
FieldPenguin Solutions, Inc.Peer context
Legal namePenguin Solutions, Inc. (formerly SMART Global Holdings)—
Exchange / IPONASDAQ: PENG · IPO 2017 (as SGH); renamed 2024SMCI NASDAQ; HPE, Dell NYSE; NetApp NASDAQ
DomicileUnited States (California headquarters)All peers US-based
Sector / industryInformation Technology · AI infrastructure, memory modules, LED—
Market cap$3.29B (51.2M basic shares × $64.21); $4.11B on 64.0M dilutedSmallest in the set; SMCI is 8.7× larger
Employees~2,900SMCI 7,000; NetApp 11,700
TTM revenue$1.73B (FY26 to 28 Aug 2026)About 4% of SMCI's
Revenue modelThree segments: Integrated Memory (~53% of FY26), Advanced Computing (~32%: AI and HPC cluster design, integration and managed services), Optimized LED (~14%)Peers sell servers and storage at much larger scale
Key differentiatorsEnd-to-end AI-cluster build and management for non-hyperscale customers; specialty and CXL memory modulesDell, HPE and SMCI compete for the same AI-factory budgets
CIK0001616533—
Websitepenguinsolutions.com—
Overall view · next 10–30 days
Mixed · strong print, crowded entry

The 6 October print was the strongest in Penguin's recent history: +68% sales growth, an eighth straight EPS beat and a FY27 guide raised to $2.43B, leaving the stock at 14.4× forward earnings, below its peers. The entry is the problem. The stock rose 24% in the 30 sessions before the print, 19.7% of float is short, the market beta is 3.35, and growth is consuming cash (−$152M of FY26 operating cash flow). In July the same setup produced +25% on the print and −28% over the next month. The view turns bullish if post-print targets move to $85–95 and late-October memory data confirms firm pricing while PENG holds $61. It turns bearish if the after-hours gain fades, memory commentary softens or the index sells off, with $55 the first refill level.

Volatility Farm
PENG · Penguin Solutions, Inc. — short-term view · 7 October 2026
1 · Daily prices and volumes for PENG, SMCI, HPE, NTAP, DELL, the technology-sector ETF and the S&P 500 ETF from the Yahoo Finance chart feed (used in place of the Massive API for bulk history). Last completed session 6 Oct 2026 close; after-hours indication from news reports. Peer market caps and TTM ratios are vendor data (Yahoo Finance) to Jun–Jul 2026.
2 · Financial statements from Penguin's Q4 and FY26 earnings release and 8-K exhibit (6 Oct 2026) and prior quarterly releases. Call slides via Investing.com; transcript via gloom.sh; filing summary via StockTitan. Consensus, ratings and insider data from Yahoo Finance and MarketBeat; company background from Dealroom.
3 · Persistency and Volatility from the Trader workbook tab Individual regimes daily (13 Aug 2025 – 6 Oct 2026, 1 trading day behind). Market regimes from Market regimes daily (to 5 Oct 2026, 2 trading days behind). Market and Sector Drivers from the Market and Sector driver tabs (to 6 Oct 2026, 1 trading day behind). Freshness status: CURRENT.
4 · Derived rather than reported: market cap (basic and diluted), EV, net debt, EV/EBITDA, P/E on guidance, P/B, P/S, PEG, FCF yield; FY26 adjusted EBITDA and every margin marked e; H1 FY26 growth; year-ago segment figures; every ratio in 9.1–9.4; peer asset turnover, revenue per employee, medians and ranks; insider totals; forward-return statistics and cumulative regime returns in sections 10 and 12; correlations and betas against peers and the S&P 500; post-print 21-session moves.
5 · This report evaluates the likely outcome over the next 10–30 days from 7 Oct 2026 (17 Oct – 6 Nov 2026). Regime and driver statistics describe their stated windows and are not predictions.
6 · This is an analytical document, not investment advice.
More reports
NEOG · 7 Oct 2026
Neogen Corporation
JBL · 1 Oct 2026
Jabil Inc.
MU · 1 Oct 2026
Micron Technology, Inc.
← Back to the archive
Reports·Calendar·Regimes·Performance·Method·About