SAIC · NASDAQ · Information Technology · IT & defence services

SAIC beat, raised the guide, and spent the pop before lunch

In short

Science Applications beat a lowered Q2 bar and lifted its full-year adjusted-EPS guide, and the stock printed an all-time high of $142.66 at the open before reversing to close only +1.8%. The raise was banked; the bookings were not — book-to-bill is 0.8 and organic growth is still guided flat-to-down. With no company catalyst until December and 99% of the stock's variance company-specific, the next 10–30 days are a post-earnings drift between a re-rate to the raise and a fill of the gap.

Close 31 Aug 2026
$128.22
30 day
▲ 13.8%
Year to date
▲ 27.4%
From 52W high
▼ 10.1%
Ann. volatility
40.3%
Regime as of
31 Aug
Market cap
$5.42B
52W range
$81.08–$142.66
TTM revenue
$7.40B
Rev growth (Q2 YoY)
+6.3%
P/S TTM
0.73×
P/E TTM
15.0×
Report date
1 Sep 2026
TTM EPS (GAAP)
$8.53
EV/EBITDA
10.7×
Book-to-bill TTM
0.8×
Total backlog
$22.1B
Net debt
$2.36B
Employees
23,000
Next catalyst
30 Sep
SAIC · 30-day price
SAIC · 1-year price
00Executive summary
DimensionFindingSignal
Revenue growthQ2 +6.3% total, +5.3% organic — first clean growth in a year; but FY27 organic guide is still −2% to 0%.Mixed
ProfitabilityAdj. EBITDA margin 10.3%; FY27 margin guide lifted to 10.3–10.5%; free cash flow guided >$600M.Bullish
Valuation vs peers0.73× sales, 12.0× forward EPS — cheapest of the peer set, but price is above the $121.50 consensus target.Mixed
Platform KPIs (bookings)Book-to-bill 0.6 for the quarter, 0.8 trailing — backlog ($22.1B) is not replacing revenue.Bearish
Balance sheetNet debt ~3.1× adj. EBITDA, $126M cash, current ratio 1.2 — covered by FCF, little slack.Mixed
Regime stateBorderline Q4 “quiet drift” (Persistency +0.04, Volatility −0.01); trend character at a 14-month low. As of 31 Aug 2026.Neutral
Driver exposure99% idiosyncratic; Market and Sector Driver correlations ~0 — company news, not the index, sets the tape.Neutral
Key risk (next 10–30 days)The failed breakout to $142.66 fills toward the $118–120 pre-gap zone; 30 Sep federal funding lapse.Bearish
Catalysts in windowNo SAIC print until ~Dec; window driven by post-release target revisions and the 30 Sep appropriations deadline.Mixed
Price actionNew all-time high $142.66 intraday, closed +1.8% on ~4× volume — distribution at the top of a +27% YTD run.Bearish
Overall view (10–30 days) — a cheap, idiosyncratic post-earnings drift; the raise supports dips, the faded breakout and above-target price cap chases.Mixed

Signal reflects the 10–30 day window only. Row tint matches the badge.

SAIC did the two things bulls wanted — beat and raised — and the market handed the gains straight back, closing barely green after touching a record. That single session is the report: the fundamentals justify the stock at 12× earnings, but the tape says the good news is in the price, and with the next catalyst three months out there is little to force a resolution before then.

01Investment thesis

Each case states what would have to happen inside the next 10–30 days for it to play out. This section argues; the verdict is section 02.

Bull case
The raise gets bought, not faded. FY27 adj. EPS guide lifted to $10.65–10.75 from $9.90–10.10 and adj. EBITDA to $750–755M; at 12.0× forward EPS SAIC is the cheapest of LDOS (11.6×), BAH (12.1×) and CACI (~19×).
Targets chase the print. Consensus $121.50 predates 31 Aug; Jefferies and TD Cowen were already at $130 and Citi $132 — post-release hikes above spot would erase the “above-target” overhang within days.
Buybacks compound the EPS. $90M repurchased in Q2; diluted share count is down to 42.8M from 46.8M a year ago (−8.5%), lifting EPS even on flat revenue.
Growth is turning. Total revenue +6.3% (organic +5.3%) after four soft quarters, and the FY27 organic guide itself was raised to −2%/0% from −4%/−2%.
Insiders bought the lows. CEO, CFO and an EVP all made open-market purchases near $100 in Dec 2025 with no sales; the stock is now +28%.
A place to hide. Beta 0.30 and 99% idiosyncratic variance — if the tape wobbles into the 30 Sep funding date, SAIC has historically decoupled.
Neutral case
A real beat of a low bar. Adjusted EPS $3.01 cleared the $2.25 consensus by 34% yet fell 17% from $3.63 a year ago; the raise is margin- and buyback-led, not a demand surprise.
Bookings say wait. Book-to-bill 0.6 for the quarter and 0.8 trailing means the $22.1B backlog is being drawn down faster than refilled — the ceiling on organic growth past FY27.
Already priced for little. At 0.73× sales the market discounts flat growth; a re-rating needs a bookings inflection this print did not deliver.
No catalyst until December. Q3 FY27 reports outside the window; the next 10–30 days are drift plus macro headlines.
Regime is neutral. Borderline Q4 with Persistency at a 14-month low — no trend edge in either direction.
Bear case
The gap fills. The 31 Aug spike to $142.66 reversed to $128.22 on ~4× volume — a textbook failed breakout; a slide into the $118–120 pre-gap zone is roughly −7% to −8%.
The stock is ahead of the Street. Consensus $121.50 and a ~$123 median sit below spot; 8 of 11 analysts rate Hold, one Strong Sell, and Goldman is at $96.
Funding cliff. Federal FY2027 appropriations lapse 30 Sep; a shutdown or stopgap delays awards and outlays for a company that is almost entirely federal.
Demand is still soft. FY27 organic growth is guided −2% to 0%; the Feb 2026 warning on procurement delays and lost recompetes (a −16% day) is only two quarters old.
Thin cushion. Net debt ~3.1× EBITDA and $126M cash leave little room to accelerate buybacks if free cash flow slips.
The funding source in a rotation. CACI grows +10.9% with book-to-bill 1.1; SAIC's flat organic line makes it the name money leaves first when the group sells off.
A beat the tape spent in one morning leaves SAIC cheap, idiosyncratic, and waiting on the next booking — not the next print.
02Composite assessment
Over the next 10–30 days SAIC is a post-earnings drift trade: with 99% of its variance company-specific and no print until December, the swing factor is whether post-release target hikes pull a below-spot consensus up through $128 before the all-time-high gap fills toward $118 — the raise was banked, the bookings were not.

2.1 — Dimension scores

Revenue growth
4.5
FY27 organic guide −2% to 0%; +6.3% Q2 total flatters the underlying line.
Profitability
6.5
Adj. EBITDA margin 10.3%, guided higher; FCF >$600M; below CACI's 12.3%.
Valuation
7.5
0.73× sales / 12.0× fwd EPS — cheapest of peers; but above the $121.50 target.
Earnings quality
5.5
Beat a lowered bar; adj. EPS −17% YoY; EPS aided by buyback, not demand.
Balance sheet
6.0
Net debt ~3.1× EBITDA; investment-grade; covered by strong FCF.
Competitive position
6.0
Entrenched defence/intel incumbent, but ceding organic share to CACI/LDOS.
Structural risk
4.5
~All-federal revenue; recompete losses, procurement delays, budget/efficiency pressure.
Regime alignment
6.0
Neutral own-regime; US market sits in SAIC's historically best bucket, but link is weak.
Driver independence
8.5
99.4% idiosyncratic — genuine diversifier, but no market tailwind to lean on.
Composite
5.9
Growth 25 · Valuation 20 · Profitability 18 · Execution 12 · Risk 10 · Regime 10 · Driver independence 5

Green at 8 and above, yellow 6–8, red below 6. The composite row states its weighting.

2.2 — Where it wins and where it loses

Wins
Cheapest in the group. 0.73× sales vs a 1.00× peer median; 12.0× forward EPS.
The guide moved the right way. +$0.75 to adj. EPS, +$30M to adj. EBITDA, organic band narrowed upward.
Cash returns. >$600M FCF guide (~11% of market cap), $90M buyback and a 1.15% dividend each quarter.
Idiosyncratic, low beta. 99% company-specific variance, beta 0.30 — a diversifier against the primary market driver.
Loses
Book-to-bill 0.6 / 0.8. Bookings are not replacing revenue — the leading indicator of organic growth is negative.
Adjusted EPS fell 17% YoY. $3.01 vs $3.63 — the “beat” is relative to a bar cut back in February.
Above the Street. $128.22 sits ~5% above the $121.50 consensus target; 8 of 11 ratings are Hold.
Momentum reversed at the record. $142.66 → $128.22 intraday; Persistency at a 14-month low as price makes highs.
03Risk factors

Ordered by what can bite inside the next 10–30 days, not by ultimate severity. Structural risks that cannot resolve inside the window are marked as context.

Live in the window
Failed-breakout gap-fill. The 31 Aug spike to a record $142.66 reversed to close $128.22 on ~4× average volume. That kind of reversal off an all-time high frequently retraces to the breakout base — here the $118–120 pre-gap zone, roughly −7% to −8%. It needs no new news, only the absence of buyers.
Federal funding lapse (30 Sep). The federal fiscal year ends 30 Sep 2026; without appropriations or a continuing resolution the government partially shuts down. SAIC is almost entirely federal, so a lapse delays new-award obligations and slows billing — a group-wide de-rating risk squarely inside the window.
Post-release estimate churn. Targets largely predate the print. If the Street anchors on the 0.8 book-to-bill rather than the EPS raise, downgrades or muted revisions leave the stock stranded above a $121.50 consensus.
Structural context
Weak organic growth & recompetes. FY27 organic growth is guided −2% to 0%. Recompete losses and procurement delays flagged in the Feb 2026 pre-announcement play out over multiple quarters — not resolvable in a month, but the overhang colours every print.
Leverage. Net debt ~3.1× adj. EBITDA and $33M of quarterly interest limit the buyback lever if free cash flow softens. A slow-burn constraint, not a near-term trigger.
Budget mix & efficiency pressure. A shift toward fixed-price work and federal cost-cutting compress margins and lengthen award cycles over years. Structural, but it is the reason organic growth is flat.

3.1 — Competitive, macro and financial

RiskCategoryMechanismBites in window?
Gap-fill after failed breakoutTechnicalReversal off record high leaves an unfilled gap toward $118–120 pre-breakout support.Yes
Government shutdown / CRMacro30 Sep appropriations lapse stalls awards and billings for an ~all-federal contractor.Possible
Consensus below spotPositioningPrice ~5% over the $121.50 target; Hold-heavy coverage limits new buyers absent upgrades.Possible
Book-to-bill < 1Competitive0.8 trailing signals shrinking backlog coverage; caps organic growth beyond FY27.Structural
Leverage / ratesFinancial~3.1× net-debt/EBITDA; $33M quarterly interest against $126M cash.Structural
Recompete / award lossesCompetitiveLost recompetes and procurement delays drive the flat-to-down organic line.Structural

For the window the risks are almost entirely non-fundamental: a technical gap and a Washington deadline. The structural problems — flat organic growth, soft bookings, leverage — are real but slow, and none of them resolves before the December print. That asymmetry is why the near-term view is mixed rather than bearish: little can break the story in a month, and little can prove it either.

04Earnings and guidance signals

4.1 — Earnings history

QuarterReport dateRevenuevs est.EPS (dil.)vs est.Reaction
Q2 FY2731 Aug 2026$1,880MBeat$2.38 / $3.01aBeat+1.8%
Q1 FY271 Jun 2026$1,906MBeat$2.61Beat+10.4%
Q4 FY2611 Feb 2026†$1,750MGuide cut$1.87Miss−16.0%
Q3 FY264 Dec 2025$1,866MBeat$1.69Beat+16.3%
Q2 FY263 Sep 2025$1,769MLight$2.71 / $3.63aBeat−6.9%

“a” = adjusted diluted EPS (the figure consensus is set against); other EPS values are GAAP diluted. † Q4 FY26 numbers were pre-announced 11 Feb 2026 alongside a FY27 organic-decline warning — the market-moving event. Reaction = next-session close change from our price series; minus signs are − (U+2212). Colour marks the sign only.

4.2 — Beat consistency

CompanyRev beat rateEPS beat rateGuidance
SAIC~55%4 of 4Raised FY27
Peer median~70%~85%

SAIC has beaten adjusted-EPS estimates four straight quarters (Zacks); revenue beats are streakier given the FY26 organic decline.

4.3 — Forward guidance

ItemValueComment
Next report date~early DecQ3 FY27 — OUTSIDE the 10–30 day window
FY27 revenue$7.2–7.3Braised from $7.0–7.2B
FY27 adj. EPS$10.65–10.75raised from $9.90–10.10
FY27 adj. EBITDA$750–755Mmargin 10.3–10.5%
FY27 free cash flow>$600Mreiterated

The one thing this section makes clear: the earnings catalyst has already fired. With the next print in December, no guidance event lands inside the window — so the raise, and the market's decision to fade it, are the last hard data points the stock gets for three months.

05Analyst outlook
PeriodSourceViewKey point
Aug 2026ZacksBullishRank #2 (Buy); +33.8% EPS surprise, four straight beats, ~12.9× forward EPS.
Aug 2026JefferiesNeutralTarget lifted $115 → $130 on execution; watching bookings.
Jul 2026CitiNeutralTarget $132 reiterated; balanced risk/reward.
Jun 2026Goldman SachsBearishTarget $85 → $96, well below spot; organic-decline and recompete concerns.
Sep 2026Consensus (11 analysts)HoldAvg target $121.50, ~5% below the $128.22 close; 8 Holds, 2 Strong Buy, 1 Strong Sell.

Coverage is thin (11 analysts) and most individual actions predate the 31 Aug print; the consensus below is best read as a pre-release anchor likely to drift up.

06Insider and board activity
DateInsiderTransactionSharesPriceValueSignal read
16 Dec 2025James Reagan, CEOOpen-market buy1,000~$100.17$100,165Conviction near the lows
Dec 2025Prabu Natarajan, EVP & CFOOpen-market buy2,000~$100.49$200,976Largest of the cluster
Dec 2025Srinivas Attili, EVP CivilianOpen-market buy100~$97.35$9,735Token, but a buy

Three insiders, three purchases, no open-market sales in the trailing period (Form 4 filings via public aggregators). The buys clustered near $100 in Dec 2025, ~22% below the current $128.22, and predate the run-up — a bullish tell that has already largely played out; no reported open-market activity around the Aug 2026 print. Governance note: Jim Reagan, interim CEO from Oct 2025 after Toni Townes-Whitley's departure, was made permanent CEO on 17 Feb 2026 — the leadership overhang is resolved.

07Recent news and catalysts
DateSourceDevelopmentIn window?
31 Aug 2026GlobeNewswireQ2 FY27 beat & raise: revenue $1.88B (+6.3%), adj. EPS $3.01; FY27 guide to $7.2–7.3B / $10.65–10.75.Just occurred
31 Aug 2026Zacks+33.8% EPS surprise; Rank #2 (Buy) reiterated.No
28 Aug 2026ZacksFresh 52-week high $130.53; +28% YTD noted into the print.No
17 Feb 2026SAICJim Reagan named permanent CEO after interim tenure.No
11 Feb 2026BenzingaPreliminary Q4 warning: procurement delays, FY27 organic decline; shares −12% to −16%.No
6 Oct 2025BenzingaAgreed to acquire SilverEdge Government Solutions for $205M (cyber, AI, national security).No
Oct 2025Washington Tech.CEO Toni Townes-Whitley departs after two years; Reagan interim.No
4 Sep 2025Motley FoolQ2 FY26: revenue decline and reduced guidance; shares −10%.No

Newest first. The final column marks whether the event falls inside the next 10–30 days.

Catalysts inside the window

30 Sep 2026 — federal FY2027 appropriations deadline. A shutdown or continuing resolution would delay awards and outlays across federal IT services; it is the one dated, hard catalyst in the window and it is macro, not company-specific. Beyond it: rolling post-release analyst target revisions (likely upward), an expected quarterly dividend declaration, and any contract-award headlines. SAIC's own next scheduled event — Q3 FY27 results — is ~early December, outside the window.

08Ratings and price targets · peer frame
CompanyPriceMarket capTTM revenueP/S TTMRev growthSource view
SAIC$128.22$5.42B$7.40B0.73×+6.3%Hold
Leidos (LDOS)$140.21$17.60B$17.63B1.00×+7.0%Buy
Booz Allen (BAH)$75.65$9.10B$11.09B0.82×−7.3%Hold
CACI International$623.01$13.77B$9.60B1.43×+17.6%Buy
Peer median$13.77B$11.09B1.00×+7.0%

Revenue growth is the latest reported quarter, year-over-year (SAIC Q2 FY27; CACI fiscal Q4; LDOS Q2; BAH fiscal Q4). SAIC carries the lowest price-to-sales of the group and the second-slowest growth — the discount is the market pricing the flat organic line, not a mispricing.

8.5Analyst price targets · multiple sources

Recent analyst actions

Analyst / sourceCurrent targetPreviousDateImplied returnRatingDirection
Jefferies (S. Kahyaoglu)$130$11519 Aug 2026+1.4%Hold▲ Raised
Citi (J. Godyn)$132$1321 Jul 2026+2.9%Neutral► Maintained
Goldman Sachs (N. Poponak)$96$8511 Jun 2026−25.1%Sell▲ Raised
TD Cowen (G. Khanna)$130$1155 Jun 2026+1.4%Hold▲ Raised
Truist Securities$110$110~Q2 2026−14.2%Hold► Maintained

Newest first. All actions predate the 31 Aug print, so these targets do not yet reflect the raise. Direction is ▲ raised, ► maintained, ▼ lowered.

MetricValue
Last close$128.22
Consensus target$121.50
Median target~$123
High target$137
Low target$93
Implied upside to consensus−5.2%
Implied downside to low−27.5%
Analysts contributing11
Target range vs last close

The stock closed above the consensus and median target and only ~7% below the Street-high $137. Post-release revisions should lift the average, but as of the data date the price already discounts the raise.

09Fundamental analysis and peer comparison

9.A — Quarterly earnings trend

QuarterRevenueQoQ ΔYoY ΔEPS (dil.)Gross marginAdj. EBITDAMarginvs est.Reaction
Q2 FY25$1,818M+1.9%$1.5811.6%~$174e~9.6eIn line
Q3 FY25$1,976M+8.7%+4.3%$2.1312.0%~$200e~10.1eBeat
Q4 FY25$1,838M−7.0%+5.8%$2.0012.6%~$173e~9.4eBeat+7.2%
Q1 FY26$1,877M+2.1%+1.6%$1.4211.1%~$161e~8.6eMiss−13.3%
Q2 FY26$1,769M−5.8%−2.7%$2.7112.2%$185M10.5%Beat−6.9%
Q3 FY26$1,866M+5.5%−5.6%$1.6912.2%~$168e~9.0eBeat+16.3%
Q4 FY26$1,750M−6.2%−4.8%$1.8713.0%~$199e~11.4eMiss−16.0%
Q1 FY27$1,906M+8.9%+1.5%$2.6113.1%~$196e~10.3eBeat+10.4%
Q2 FY27$1,880M−1.4%+6.3%$2.38~12.9e$193M10.3%Beat+1.8%
Q3–Q4 FY27 guide~$1,730M~$185M~10.7Implied

EPS is GAAP diluted. Adj. EBITDA marked “e” is derived (operating income plus estimated D&A) — only Q2 FY26 and Q2 FY27 are reported. Reaction is the next-session close change; several prints moved the stock 7–16% either way — the earnings-day variance is the single most important risk statistic on this page. Guide row is the FY27 H2 implied from the raised full-year midpoint.

Revenue $M · own band
Operating margin % · own band

Revenue and margin sit on two stacked bands, never one. Revenue has round-tripped $1.75–1.98B for two years; the story is the flat top line, not the quarter-to-quarter noise.

9.1 — Liquidity

Metric1 Aug 202630 Jan 202631 Jan 2025Target
Current ratio1.201.200.831.5–3.0 healthy; services model runs lower
Quick ratio1.061.050.76≥1.0 healthy (minimal inventory)
Cash ratio0.120.190.04Thin absolute cash ($126M)

Column headers are actual reporting dates. Liquidity improved off the tight FY25 year-end but cash is modest; the business funds itself on receivables turnover and revolver access, normal for federal services.

9.2 — Leverage and solvency

Metric1 Aug 202630 Jan 202631 Jan 2025Target
Debt-to-equity1.731.661.52Rising as buybacks shrink equity
Debt-to-assets0.460.460.46<0.5 — steady
Interest coverage~4.6×e~4.1×e~4.0×e>2.5 healthy; op. income / interest
Debt service coverage~4.0×e~3.6×e~3.5×e>1.25 healthy; FCF-based, derived

Coverage metrics marked “e” are derived from operating income, ~$33M quarterly interest and free cash flow. Net debt of ~$2.36B is ~3.1× the FY27 adj. EBITDA guide — elevated but comfortably serviced by >$600M of guided free cash flow.

9.3 — Profitability

MetricQ2 FY27TTMQ2 FY26FY26FY25Trend
Gross margin~12.9e12.712.212.111.9
Operating margin8.18.27.97.47.5
Net margin5.45.17.24.94.8
Adj. EBITDA margin10.3~10.2e10.5~9.6e~9.4e
Return on assets7.06.76.9
Return on equity26.523.923.0
DuPont (NPM × AT × EM)~26~24~23
Peer comparison (most recent)GrossOp marginNet marginAdj. EBITDAROERank
SAIC~12.78.25.110.326.53 of 4
Leidos~17e~11e7.8~12e~27e1 of 4
Booz Allen~24e~9e7.0~10e~45e2 of 4
CACI~32e~9e5.612.3~15e4 of 4
Peer median~24~97.012.0~27

Peer figures marked “e” are estimated from reported net income, revenue and EBITDA; gross margins are not reported on a uniform basis. SAIC's EBITDA margin trails CACI and Leidos but its 26.5% ROE is high — a leverage-and-buyback effect, not superior operating returns.

9.4 — Efficiency, growth and platform

MetricCurrent / TTMPrior year
Asset turnover1.36×1.43×
EPS growth (YoY)+11%+7%
Dividend yield1.15%1.3%
Platform metricQ2 FY27Comment
Net bookings$1.2Bbook-to-bill 0.6 for the quarter
Book-to-bill (TTM)0.8×below 1.0 — backlog erosion
Total backlog$22.1B~2.9× TTM revenue
Funded backlog$3.8Bnear-term visibility
CompanyAsset turnoverRev / employeeEmployeesRev growthDiv yieldRank
SAIC1.36×$322K23,000+6.3%1.15%3 of 4
Leidos~0.9×e$375K47,000+7.0%1.23%2 of 4
Booz Allen~1.4×e$352K31,500−7.3%3.12%4 of 4
CACI~1.0×e$356K27,000+17.6%0.0%1 of 4

Revenue per employee is the lowest of the group; growth ranking runs CACI > Leidos ≈ SAIC > Booz Allen. Booz Allen carries the peer's only real dividend (3.1%); CACI pays none and reinvests.

9.5 — Valuation multiples

MetricCurrentComment
P/E TTM15.0×on depressed GAAP EPS
Forward P/E12.0×on $10.70 FY27 adj. EPS
Price / sales TTM0.73×below 1.00× peer median
Price / book3.78×equity thinned by buybacks
EV / EBITDA10.7×net debt in the numerator
PEG (fwd)~1.1on ~11% forward EPS growth
PeerP/S TTMP/E TTMFwd P/E
SAIC0.73×15.0×12.0×
Leidos1.00×13.1×11.6×
Booz Allen0.82×11.9×12.1×
CACI1.43×20.9×~19×
Peer median1.00×13.1×12.1×

On sales SAIC is the cheapest name in the group and on forward earnings it is in line with Leidos and Booz Allen and far below CACI — so the valuation gives the stock room if sentiment turns. But the multiple is low for a reason: flat organic growth and a sub-1 book-to-bill. Over the next 10–30 days the cheapness cushions downside more than it powers upside — it takes a bookings signal, not another EPS beat, to re-rate, and none is scheduled before December.

10Regime analysis · Persistency and Volatility
+0.04
P
Persistency — at its 2nd-percentile low, the multi-month trend's momentum is fading even as price makes new highs.
290 daily observations, 8 Jul 2025 – 31 Aug 2026. As of 31 Aug 2026 — 1 trading day behind the report date.

10.1 — Regime trace

Persistency on x, Volatility on y, oldest faint to newest bright. Q1 volatile trend, Q2 volatile chop, Q3 quiet range, Q4 quiet drift. The path runs almost entirely along the top and bottom of the right half: Persistency has stayed positive throughout while Volatility swings — the vertical-run behaviour expected of a slow Persistency series. Source: Trader workbook, Individual regimes daily. As of 31 Aug 2026 — 1 trading day behind the report date.

10.2 — Current regime read

MeasureCurrentMeanStd devMinMaxPercentileInterpretation
Persistency+0.03850.11210.03510.02830.14352.4Random / Neutral — trending character at a 14-month low
Volatility−0.01380.00170.2891−0.49660.500048.6Normal Vol — mid-range; the 31 Aug gap will lift the next read

Currently in Q4 “quiet drift”, held 3 consecutive periods. Both readings sit within 0.05 of an axis, so the quadrant call is borderline and provisional — SAIC is effectively at the origin of the map. Correlations, exponents and betas are never coloured; only signed values with valence are.

10.3 — Occupancy and transitions

QuadrantLabel% of period
Q1Volatile trend50.3
Q2Volatile chop0.0
Q3Quiet range0.0
Q4Quiet drift49.7
TransitionCountNote
Q1 → Q49volatility falls, trend intact
Q4 → Q18volatility rises, trend intact
Persistency moves slowly.

SAIC has spent the entire 14-month daily history in only two quadrants — Q1 and Q4 — because Persistency never turned negative; all 17 transitions are vertical volatility flips. The series updates far less often than Volatility and can hold one value for weeks. That is the data behaving normally. These statistics describe the stated window and are not predictions.

11Driver exposure · Market and Sector
99.4
%
of daily variance is company-specific
Regression on Market Driver 1 and Sector Driver 1, 499 overlapping observations, 4 Sep 2024 – 31 Aug 2026.

11.1 — Driver correlations

DriverCorrelationR² (%)Rolling 60dRolling minRolling maxStabilityDirection
Market Driver 1 Primary0.0110.00.036−0.3030.375VariableNeutral
Market Driver 20.0550.30.127−0.0640.186StablePositive
Market Driver 3−0.0190.0−0.315−0.3190.167VariableNeutral
Market Driver 4−0.0280.10.148−0.5280.373VariableNeutral
Market Driver 5−0.0240.1−0.201−0.4190.435VariableNeutral
Sector Driver 1 Primary−0.0730.50.103−0.3010.308VariableNegative
Sector Driver 20.0740.5−0.293−0.3370.365VariablePositive
Sector Driver 3−0.0080.0−0.018−0.2640.228VariableNeutral

Market Drivers 1–5 then Sector Drivers 1–3. Daily log returns vs first-differenced Market Driver levels and return-scaled Sector Driver values, 499 observations. Every correlation is near zero and none is stable — there is no persistent factor link to trade. Correlations are never coloured. Drivers as of 31 Aug 2026 — 1 trading day behind the report date.

11.2 — Systematic vs idiosyncratic

Idiosyncratic 99.4%
DriverRaw betaStandardised betaShare of explained variance
Market Driver 1 (primary)0.000030.0180.0%
Sector Driver 1 (primary)−0.05359−0.0750.5%

The systematic sliver is 0.6% (Market Driver 1 + Sector Driver 1); the bar's left edge is drawn slightly wide for legibility.

This is neither a beta vehicle nor a sector proxy — it is an almost purely idiosyncratic name. Over 99% of SAIC's daily variance is unexplained by the market and sector drivers, which means the company, not the index, decides the next month: contract awards, bookings and the post-earnings tape will move the stock, and a broad-market hedge would have done almost nothing to offset it.

11.3 — Rolling 60-day driver correlation

Market Driver 1 (solid) and Sector Driver 1 (dashed) against SAIC's daily returns. Both oscillate around zero across the whole window and cross repeatedly — the current readings (+0.04 and +0.10) are as uninformative as the average. No inversion or regime in the linkage; the independence is structural, not a passing phase.

12Performance by market regime

SAIC's daily returns conditioned on each group's regime, 4 Sep 2024 – 31 Aug 2026 (499 sessions). Every group is named, never its proxy ticker. Conditional statistics describe the stated window and are not forecasts — and with 99% idiosyncratic variance, the conditioning is weak by construction.

12.1 — US market · currently in Q1 Volatile Trend

Market regimeDays% of periodCumulative returnAnn. returnAnn. volSharpeHit rateBest dayWorst day
Volatile trend9719.4+22.1%+67.9%30.52.2257.7+9.93−4.15
Volatile chop17535.1+10.3%+15.2%43.80.3550.3+15.09−16.17
Quiet range11923.8−16.2%−31.3%41.0−0.7653.8+5.76−17.48
Quiet drift10821.6−11.3%−24.4%30.6−0.8048.1+5.07−7.17

The US market is in Volatile Trend today — historically SAIC's best US-market bucket (+22.1% cumulative over 97 days, Sharpe 2.22). Read as description, not signal.

12.1b — SP500 · currently in Q1 Volatile Trend

Market regimeDays% of periodCumulative returnAnn. returnAnn. volSharpeHit rateBest dayWorst day
Volatile trend9719.4+34.3%+115.3%32.43.5555.7+9.93−4.58
Quiet range15030.1+6.5%+11.2%43.10.2654.0+15.09−17.48
Volatile chop18236.5−6.3%−8.6%38.8−0.2251.6+8.52−16.17
Quiet drift7014.0−25.4%−65.1%31.4−2.0744.3+3.63−7.17

Same pattern as the broad market, sharper: SAIC's best days have clustered when the SP500 itself trends with volatility.

12.1c — Global market · currently in Q2 Volatile Chop

Market regimeDays% of periodCumulative returnAnn. returnAnn. volSharpeHit rateBest dayWorst day
Volatile trend Small sample336.6+20.2%+307.7%36.98.3360.6+9.93−3.89
Volatile chop23146.3+9.0%+9.9%32.80.3053.2+6.91−14.22
Quiet range23547.1−23.6%−25.1%42.8−0.5949.8+15.09−17.48

The global market sits in Volatile Chop, where SAIC's history is a modest +9.0% cumulative (Sharpe 0.30). The +307.7% annualised in the 33-day Volatile-Trend bucket is a small-sample artefact — the +20.2% cumulative is the honest figure.

12.2 — Cross-group summary

GroupCurrent regimeBest regimeWorst regimeCum. return in currentSharpe in currentSharpe spreadDays in current
US marketVolatile trendVolatile trendQuiet drift+22.1%2.223.0297
SP500Volatile trendVolatile trendQuiet drift+34.3%3.555.6297
Global marketVolatile chopVolatile trendQuiet range+9.0%0.308.92231
TechnologyQuiet rangeVolatile chopQuiet drift+1.4%0.052.24180
FinancialsQuiet driftQuiet driftVolatile chop+23.4%6.507.0644
EnergyVolatile trendVolatile trendVolatile chop+30.3%2.983.38104
UtilitiesVolatile chopVolatile chopQuiet drift+23.3%1.792.91135
EuropeQuiet driftQuiet driftVolatile trend+24.0%1.912.71125
GoldVolatile chopQuiet rangeVolatile chop−23.3%−0.383.90399
VIX NearQuiet driftQuiet rangeQuiet drift−11.0%−1.812.5647
VIX MidQuiet driftVolatile trendQuiet range+14.4%0.963.56120
Bonds nearQuiet rangeVolatile chopVolatile trend−28.4%−0.695.00231
Bonds midQuiet rangeVolatile chopVolatile trend−6.1%−0.154.04266
Bonds longQuiet rangeVolatile trendQuiet drift−22.2%−0.396.34355

Cumulative return and Sharpe are SAIC's outcome while each group has been in its current regime, over the 499-session window. Coloured only where the sign carries valence.

12.3 — Sensitivity

Widest dispersion is against the Global-market regime (Sharpe spread 8.92), though a 33-day bucket inflates it; the most robust real sensitivity is to the SP500 regime (spread 5.62 on full samples).
The dominant groups sit in SAIC's best historical bucket. Both the US market and SP500 are in Volatile Trend today — the regime in which SAIC returned +22% and +34% cumulatively (Sharpe 2.2–3.6) over the window. Stated as history, not a forecast.
But the read is weak by construction. With 99% idiosyncratic variance, the fact that broad equity is in SAIC's “good” regime carries little weight — the company's own news swamps the market conditioning over any 10–30 day window.
Do not trade this table.

Regime-conditional history describes 4 Sep 2024 – 31 Aug 2026, not the future. The Global-market Volatile-Trend bucket holds 33 days and its annualised figure should be ignored. Market-regime series as of 31 Aug 2026 — 1 trading day behind the report date.

13News and market narrative
DateHeadlineSentiment
31 Aug 26Q2 FY27 beat & raise; FY27 guide lifted to $7.2–7.3B / $10.65–10.75 adj. EPSPositive
31 Aug 26Zacks: +33.8% EPS surprise; Rank #2 (Buy) reiteratedPositive
31 Aug 26Stock spikes to all-time high $142.66 intraday, then fades to close +1.8%Mixed
28 Aug 26Fresh 52-week high $130.53; +28% YTD into the printPositive
19 Aug 26Jefferies raises target to $130 from $115Positive
17 Feb 26Jim Reagan named permanent CEO after interim tenurePositive
11 Feb 26Preliminary Q4 warning: procurement delays, FY27 organic decline; shares −16%Negative
16 Dec 25CEO, CFO and an EVP buy stock on the open market near $100Positive
4 Dec 25Q3 FY26 tops estimates; shares +16%Positive
6 Oct 25Agrees to acquire SilverEdge Government Solutions for $205MPositive
Oct 25CEO Toni Townes-Whitley departs after two yearsNegative
4 Sep 25Q2 FY26 revenue declines, guidance cut; shares −10%Negative

Newest first. The narrative has swung from a February growth scare and a leadership vacuum to a settled CEO and two consecutive beat-and-raises — the stock has re-rated with it, which is precisely why the bar into the next quarter is now higher.

14Company snapshot
FieldScience Applications International Corp.Peer context
Legal nameScience Applications International Corporation
Exchange / IPONASDAQ: SAIC / listed 16 Sep 2013peers on NYSE
DomicileReston, Virginia, USAsame DC-metro cluster as LDOS, CACI, BAH
Sector / industryInformation Technology / IT & defence services (SIC 7373)
Market cap$5.42Bsmallest of the four (LDOS $17.6B, CACI $13.8B, BAH $9.1B)
Employees~23,000smallest headcount of the group
TTM revenue$7.40Bvs LDOS $17.6B, BAH $11.1B, CACI $9.6B
Revenue modelCost-plus, T&M and fixed-price service contracts; ~all U.S. federalDefense & Intelligence ~77%, Civilian ~23%
Key differentiatorsEntrenched defence/intel systems integrator; digital engineering, C4ISR, mission IT, enterprise ITscale-disadvantaged but focused
CIK0001571123
Websitesaic.com
Overall view · next 10–30 days
Mixed · high variance

SAIC did what bulls asked — beat and raised — and the market handed the gains straight back, printing a record $142.66 before closing +1.8%. The evidence favours neither a clean breakout nor a breakdown over the window: a cheap 12× multiple, a lifted EPS guide, buybacks and insider conviction support dips, while a failed breakout, an above-target price, a Hold-heavy Street and a sub-1 book-to-bill cap chases — and with 99% idiosyncratic variance the next move is a company story, not a market one. The single condition that flips it bullish is post-release target hikes dragging consensus up through $128 while price holds the $126–128 zone; it flips bearish on a fill of the 31 Aug gap toward $118 or a 30 September federal-funding disruption.

Volatility Farm
SAIC · Science Applications International Corp. — short-term view · 1 September 2026
1 · Prices, market capitalisations and reference data from the Massive market-data API. Last completed session 31 Aug 2026 close.
2 · Financial statements from SAIC's Q2 FY2027 earnings release (31 Aug 2026), the Feb 2026 preliminary Q4 announcement, and prior quarterly results; peer figures from Leidos, Booz Allen and CACI releases and public aggregators.
3 · Persistency, Volatility and Market/Sector Driver series from the proprietary Trader workbook (Individual regimes daily, Market regimes daily, and the Market Driver and Sector Driver series), as of 31 Aug 2026, 1 trading day behind this report date — CURRENT.
4 · Figures marked with a superscript e or “~” are derived rather than reported: per-quarter adjusted EBITDA (operating income + estimated D&A; only Q2 FY26 and Q2 FY27 are reported), interest- and debt-service-coverage ratios, Q2 FY27 gross margin, the ~$123 median target, FY25/FY26 adjusted-EBITDA margins, and peer gross/operating margins and ROE. Regime statistics were computed from the workbook series and SAIC's daily returns using the standard Persistency/Volatility and driver-decomposition method.
5 · This report evaluates the likely outcome over the next 10–30 days from 1 Sep 2026. Regime and driver statistics are descriptive of their stated windows and are not predictions.
6 · This is an analytical document, not investment advice.
More reports
NIO · 2 Sep 2026
NIO Inc.
FRO · 28 Aug 2026
Frontline plc
SJM · 26 Aug 2026
The J.M. Smucker Company
← Back to the archive