Science Applications beat a lowered Q2 bar and lifted its full-year adjusted-EPS guide, and the stock printed an all-time high of $142.66 at the open before reversing to close only +1.8%. The raise was banked; the bookings were not — book-to-bill is 0.8 and organic growth is still guided flat-to-down. With no company catalyst until December and 99% of the stock's variance company-specific, the next 10–30 days are a post-earnings drift between a re-rate to the raise and a fill of the gap.
| Dimension | Finding | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | Q2 +6.3% total, +5.3% organic — first clean growth in a year; but FY27 organic guide is still −2% to 0%. | Mixed |
| Profitability | Adj. EBITDA margin 10.3%; FY27 margin guide lifted to 10.3–10.5%; free cash flow guided >$600M. | Bullish |
| Valuation vs peers | 0.73× sales, 12.0× forward EPS — cheapest of the peer set, but price is above the $121.50 consensus target. | Mixed |
| Platform KPIs (bookings) | Book-to-bill 0.6 for the quarter, 0.8 trailing — backlog ($22.1B) is not replacing revenue. | Bearish |
| Balance sheet | Net debt ~3.1× adj. EBITDA, $126M cash, current ratio 1.2 — covered by FCF, little slack. | Mixed |
| Regime state | Borderline Q4 “quiet drift” (Persistency +0.04, Volatility −0.01); trend character at a 14-month low. As of 31 Aug 2026. | Neutral |
| Driver exposure | 99% idiosyncratic; Market and Sector Driver correlations ~0 — company news, not the index, sets the tape. | Neutral |
| Key risk (next 10–30 days) | The failed breakout to $142.66 fills toward the $118–120 pre-gap zone; 30 Sep federal funding lapse. | Bearish |
| Catalysts in window | No SAIC print until ~Dec; window driven by post-release target revisions and the 30 Sep appropriations deadline. | Mixed |
| Price action | New all-time high $142.66 intraday, closed +1.8% on ~4× volume — distribution at the top of a +27% YTD run. | Bearish |
| Overall view (10–30 days) — a cheap, idiosyncratic post-earnings drift; the raise supports dips, the faded breakout and above-target price cap chases. | Mixed | |
Signal reflects the 10–30 day window only. Row tint matches the badge.
SAIC did the two things bulls wanted — beat and raised — and the market handed the gains straight back, closing barely green after touching a record. That single session is the report: the fundamentals justify the stock at 12× earnings, but the tape says the good news is in the price, and with the next catalyst three months out there is little to force a resolution before then.
Each case states what would have to happen inside the next 10–30 days for it to play out. This section argues; the verdict is section 02.
Green at 8 and above, yellow 6–8, red below 6. The composite row states its weighting.
Ordered by what can bite inside the next 10–30 days, not by ultimate severity. Structural risks that cannot resolve inside the window are marked as context.
| Risk | Category | Mechanism | Bites in window? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gap-fill after failed breakout | Technical | Reversal off record high leaves an unfilled gap toward $118–120 pre-breakout support. | Yes |
| Government shutdown / CR | Macro | 30 Sep appropriations lapse stalls awards and billings for an ~all-federal contractor. | Possible |
| Consensus below spot | Positioning | Price ~5% over the $121.50 target; Hold-heavy coverage limits new buyers absent upgrades. | Possible |
| Book-to-bill < 1 | Competitive | 0.8 trailing signals shrinking backlog coverage; caps organic growth beyond FY27. | Structural |
| Leverage / rates | Financial | ~3.1× net-debt/EBITDA; $33M quarterly interest against $126M cash. | Structural |
| Recompete / award losses | Competitive | Lost recompetes and procurement delays drive the flat-to-down organic line. | Structural |
For the window the risks are almost entirely non-fundamental: a technical gap and a Washington deadline. The structural problems — flat organic growth, soft bookings, leverage — are real but slow, and none of them resolves before the December print. That asymmetry is why the near-term view is mixed rather than bearish: little can break the story in a month, and little can prove it either.
| Quarter | Report date | Revenue | vs est. | EPS (dil.) | vs est. | Reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY27 | 31 Aug 2026 | $1,880M | Beat | $2.38 / $3.01a | Beat | +1.8% |
| Q1 FY27 | 1 Jun 2026 | $1,906M | Beat | $2.61 | Beat | +10.4% |
| Q4 FY26 | 11 Feb 2026† | $1,750M | Guide cut | $1.87 | Miss | −16.0% |
| Q3 FY26 | 4 Dec 2025 | $1,866M | Beat | $1.69 | Beat | +16.3% |
| Q2 FY26 | 3 Sep 2025 | $1,769M | Light | $2.71 / $3.63a | Beat | −6.9% |
“a” = adjusted diluted EPS (the figure consensus is set against); other EPS values are GAAP diluted. † Q4 FY26 numbers were pre-announced 11 Feb 2026 alongside a FY27 organic-decline warning — the market-moving event. Reaction = next-session close change from our price series; minus signs are − (U+2212). Colour marks the sign only.
| Company | Rev beat rate | EPS beat rate | Guidance |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAIC | ~55% | 4 of 4 | Raised FY27 |
| Peer median | ~70% | ~85% | — |
SAIC has beaten adjusted-EPS estimates four straight quarters (Zacks); revenue beats are streakier given the FY26 organic decline.
| Item | Value | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Next report date | ~early Dec | Q3 FY27 — OUTSIDE the 10–30 day window |
| FY27 revenue | $7.2–7.3B | raised from $7.0–7.2B |
| FY27 adj. EPS | $10.65–10.75 | raised from $9.90–10.10 |
| FY27 adj. EBITDA | $750–755M | margin 10.3–10.5% |
| FY27 free cash flow | >$600M | reiterated |
The one thing this section makes clear: the earnings catalyst has already fired. With the next print in December, no guidance event lands inside the window — so the raise, and the market's decision to fade it, are the last hard data points the stock gets for three months.
| Period | Source | View | Key point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2026 | Zacks | Bullish | Rank #2 (Buy); +33.8% EPS surprise, four straight beats, ~12.9× forward EPS. |
| Aug 2026 | Jefferies | Neutral | Target lifted $115 → $130 on execution; watching bookings. |
| Jul 2026 | Citi | Neutral | Target $132 reiterated; balanced risk/reward. |
| Jun 2026 | Goldman Sachs | Bearish | Target $85 → $96, well below spot; organic-decline and recompete concerns. |
| Sep 2026 | Consensus (11 analysts) | Hold | Avg target $121.50, ~5% below the $128.22 close; 8 Holds, 2 Strong Buy, 1 Strong Sell. |
Coverage is thin (11 analysts) and most individual actions predate the 31 Aug print; the consensus below is best read as a pre-release anchor likely to drift up.
| Date | Insider | Transaction | Shares | Price | Value | Signal read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Dec 2025 | James Reagan, CEO | Open-market buy | 1,000 | ~$100.17 | $100,165 | Conviction near the lows |
| Dec 2025 | Prabu Natarajan, EVP & CFO | Open-market buy | 2,000 | ~$100.49 | $200,976 | Largest of the cluster |
| Dec 2025 | Srinivas Attili, EVP Civilian | Open-market buy | 100 | ~$97.35 | $9,735 | Token, but a buy |
Three insiders, three purchases, no open-market sales in the trailing period (Form 4 filings via public aggregators). The buys clustered near $100 in Dec 2025, ~22% below the current $128.22, and predate the run-up — a bullish tell that has already largely played out; no reported open-market activity around the Aug 2026 print. Governance note: Jim Reagan, interim CEO from Oct 2025 after Toni Townes-Whitley's departure, was made permanent CEO on 17 Feb 2026 — the leadership overhang is resolved.
| Date | Source | Development | In window? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026 | GlobeNewswire | Q2 FY27 beat & raise: revenue $1.88B (+6.3%), adj. EPS $3.01; FY27 guide to $7.2–7.3B / $10.65–10.75. | Just occurred |
| 31 Aug 2026 | Zacks | +33.8% EPS surprise; Rank #2 (Buy) reiterated. | No |
| 28 Aug 2026 | Zacks | Fresh 52-week high $130.53; +28% YTD noted into the print. | No |
| 17 Feb 2026 | SAIC | Jim Reagan named permanent CEO after interim tenure. | No |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Benzinga | Preliminary Q4 warning: procurement delays, FY27 organic decline; shares −12% to −16%. | No |
| 6 Oct 2025 | Benzinga | Agreed to acquire SilverEdge Government Solutions for $205M (cyber, AI, national security). | No |
| Oct 2025 | Washington Tech. | CEO Toni Townes-Whitley departs after two years; Reagan interim. | No |
| 4 Sep 2025 | Motley Fool | Q2 FY26: revenue decline and reduced guidance; shares −10%. | No |
Newest first. The final column marks whether the event falls inside the next 10–30 days.
30 Sep 2026 — federal FY2027 appropriations deadline. A shutdown or continuing resolution would delay awards and outlays across federal IT services; it is the one dated, hard catalyst in the window and it is macro, not company-specific. Beyond it: rolling post-release analyst target revisions (likely upward), an expected quarterly dividend declaration, and any contract-award headlines. SAIC's own next scheduled event — Q3 FY27 results — is ~early December, outside the window.
| Company | Price | Market cap | TTM revenue | P/S TTM | Rev growth | Source view |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAIC | $128.22 | $5.42B | $7.40B | 0.73× | +6.3% | Hold |
| Leidos (LDOS) | $140.21 | $17.60B | $17.63B | 1.00× | +7.0% | Buy |
| Booz Allen (BAH) | $75.65 | $9.10B | $11.09B | 0.82× | −7.3% | Hold |
| CACI International | $623.01 | $13.77B | $9.60B | 1.43× | +17.6% | Buy |
| Peer median | — | $13.77B | $11.09B | 1.00× | +7.0% | — |
Revenue growth is the latest reported quarter, year-over-year (SAIC Q2 FY27; CACI fiscal Q4; LDOS Q2; BAH fiscal Q4). SAIC carries the lowest price-to-sales of the group and the second-slowest growth — the discount is the market pricing the flat organic line, not a mispricing.
| Analyst / source | Current target | Previous | Date | Implied return | Rating | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jefferies (S. Kahyaoglu) | $130 | $115 | 19 Aug 2026 | +1.4% | Hold | ▲ Raised |
| Citi (J. Godyn) | $132 | $132 | 1 Jul 2026 | +2.9% | Neutral | ► Maintained |
| Goldman Sachs (N. Poponak) | $96 | $85 | 11 Jun 2026 | −25.1% | Sell | ▲ Raised |
| TD Cowen (G. Khanna) | $130 | $115 | 5 Jun 2026 | +1.4% | Hold | ▲ Raised |
| Truist Securities | $110 | $110 | ~Q2 2026 | −14.2% | Hold | ► Maintained |
Newest first. All actions predate the 31 Aug print, so these targets do not yet reflect the raise. Direction is ▲ raised, ► maintained, ▼ lowered.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Last close | $128.22 |
| Consensus target | $121.50 |
| Median target | ~$123 |
| High target | $137 |
| Low target | $93 |
| Implied upside to consensus | −5.2% |
| Implied downside to low | −27.5% |
| Analysts contributing | 11 |
The stock closed above the consensus and median target and only ~7% below the Street-high $137. Post-release revisions should lift the average, but as of the data date the price already discounts the raise.
| Quarter | Revenue | QoQ Δ | YoY Δ | EPS (dil.) | Gross margin | Adj. EBITDA | Margin | vs est. | Reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 FY25 | $1,818M | — | +1.9% | $1.58 | 11.6% | ~$174e | ~9.6e | In line | — |
| Q3 FY25 | $1,976M | +8.7% | +4.3% | $2.13 | 12.0% | ~$200e | ~10.1e | Beat | — |
| Q4 FY25 | $1,838M | −7.0% | +5.8% | $2.00 | 12.6% | ~$173e | ~9.4e | Beat | +7.2% |
| Q1 FY26 | $1,877M | +2.1% | +1.6% | $1.42 | 11.1% | ~$161e | ~8.6e | Miss | −13.3% |
| Q2 FY26 | $1,769M | −5.8% | −2.7% | $2.71 | 12.2% | $185M | 10.5% | Beat | −6.9% |
| Q3 FY26 | $1,866M | +5.5% | −5.6% | $1.69 | 12.2% | ~$168e | ~9.0e | Beat | +16.3% |
| Q4 FY26 | $1,750M | −6.2% | −4.8% | $1.87 | 13.0% | ~$199e | ~11.4e | Miss | −16.0% |
| Q1 FY27 | $1,906M | +8.9% | +1.5% | $2.61 | 13.1% | ~$196e | ~10.3e | Beat | +10.4% |
| Q2 FY27 | $1,880M | −1.4% | +6.3% | $2.38 | ~12.9e | $193M | 10.3% | Beat | +1.8% |
| Q3–Q4 FY27 guide | ~$1,730M | — | — | — | — | ~$185M | ~10.7 | Implied | — |
EPS is GAAP diluted. Adj. EBITDA marked “e” is derived (operating income plus estimated D&A) — only Q2 FY26 and Q2 FY27 are reported. Reaction is the next-session close change; several prints moved the stock 7–16% either way — the earnings-day variance is the single most important risk statistic on this page. Guide row is the FY27 H2 implied from the raised full-year midpoint.
Revenue and margin sit on two stacked bands, never one. Revenue has round-tripped $1.75–1.98B for two years; the story is the flat top line, not the quarter-to-quarter noise.
| Metric | 1 Aug 2026 | 30 Jan 2026 | 31 Jan 2025 | Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.83 | 1.5–3.0 healthy; services model runs lower |
| Quick ratio | 1.06 | 1.05 | 0.76 | ≥1.0 healthy (minimal inventory) |
| Cash ratio | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.04 | Thin absolute cash ($126M) |
Column headers are actual reporting dates. Liquidity improved off the tight FY25 year-end but cash is modest; the business funds itself on receivables turnover and revolver access, normal for federal services.
| Metric | 1 Aug 2026 | 30 Jan 2026 | 31 Jan 2025 | Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt-to-equity | 1.73 | 1.66 | 1.52 | Rising as buybacks shrink equity |
| Debt-to-assets | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | <0.5 — steady |
| Interest coverage | ~4.6×e | ~4.1×e | ~4.0×e | >2.5 healthy; op. income / interest |
| Debt service coverage | ~4.0×e | ~3.6×e | ~3.5×e | >1.25 healthy; FCF-based, derived |
Coverage metrics marked “e” are derived from operating income, ~$33M quarterly interest and free cash flow. Net debt of ~$2.36B is ~3.1× the FY27 adj. EBITDA guide — elevated but comfortably serviced by >$600M of guided free cash flow.
| Metric | Q2 FY27 | TTM | Q2 FY26 | FY26 | FY25 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | ~12.9e | 12.7 | 12.2 | 12.1 | 11.9 | ▲ |
| Operating margin | 8.1 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 7.4 | 7.5 | ▲ |
| Net margin | 5.4 | 5.1 | 7.2 | 4.9 | 4.8 | → |
| Adj. EBITDA margin | 10.3 | ~10.2e | 10.5 | ~9.6e | ~9.4e | ▲ |
| Return on assets | — | 7.0 | — | 6.7 | 6.9 | → |
| Return on equity | — | 26.5 | — | 23.9 | 23.0 | ▲ |
| DuPont (NPM × AT × EM) | — | ~26 | — | ~24 | ~23 | ▲ |
| Peer comparison (most recent) | Gross | Op margin | Net margin | Adj. EBITDA | ROE | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAIC | ~12.7 | 8.2 | 5.1 | 10.3 | 26.5 | 3 of 4 |
| Leidos | ~17e | ~11e | 7.8 | ~12e | ~27e | 1 of 4 |
| Booz Allen | ~24e | ~9e | 7.0 | ~10e | ~45e | 2 of 4 |
| CACI | ~32e | ~9e | 5.6 | 12.3 | ~15e | 4 of 4 |
| Peer median | ~24 | ~9 | 7.0 | 12.0 | ~27 | — |
Peer figures marked “e” are estimated from reported net income, revenue and EBITDA; gross margins are not reported on a uniform basis. SAIC's EBITDA margin trails CACI and Leidos but its 26.5% ROE is high — a leverage-and-buyback effect, not superior operating returns.
| Metric | Current / TTM | Prior year |
|---|---|---|
| Asset turnover | 1.36× | 1.43× |
| EPS growth (YoY) | +11% | +7% |
| Dividend yield | 1.15% | 1.3% |
| Platform metric | Q2 FY27 | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Net bookings | $1.2B | book-to-bill 0.6 for the quarter |
| Book-to-bill (TTM) | 0.8× | below 1.0 — backlog erosion |
| Total backlog | $22.1B | ~2.9× TTM revenue |
| Funded backlog | $3.8B | near-term visibility |
| Company | Asset turnover | Rev / employee | Employees | Rev growth | Div yield | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAIC | 1.36× | $322K | 23,000 | +6.3% | 1.15% | 3 of 4 |
| Leidos | ~0.9×e | $375K | 47,000 | +7.0% | 1.23% | 2 of 4 |
| Booz Allen | ~1.4×e | $352K | 31,500 | −7.3% | 3.12% | 4 of 4 |
| CACI | ~1.0×e | $356K | 27,000 | +17.6% | 0.0% | 1 of 4 |
Revenue per employee is the lowest of the group; growth ranking runs CACI > Leidos ≈ SAIC > Booz Allen. Booz Allen carries the peer's only real dividend (3.1%); CACI pays none and reinvests.
| Metric | Current | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| P/E TTM | 15.0× | on depressed GAAP EPS |
| Forward P/E | 12.0× | on $10.70 FY27 adj. EPS |
| Price / sales TTM | 0.73× | below 1.00× peer median |
| Price / book | 3.78× | equity thinned by buybacks |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.7× | net debt in the numerator |
| PEG (fwd) | ~1.1 | on ~11% forward EPS growth |
| Peer | P/S TTM | P/E TTM | Fwd P/E |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAIC | 0.73× | 15.0× | 12.0× |
| Leidos | 1.00× | 13.1× | 11.6× |
| Booz Allen | 0.82× | 11.9× | 12.1× |
| CACI | 1.43× | 20.9× | ~19× |
| Peer median | 1.00× | 13.1× | 12.1× |
On sales SAIC is the cheapest name in the group and on forward earnings it is in line with Leidos and Booz Allen and far below CACI — so the valuation gives the stock room if sentiment turns. But the multiple is low for a reason: flat organic growth and a sub-1 book-to-bill. Over the next 10–30 days the cheapness cushions downside more than it powers upside — it takes a bookings signal, not another EPS beat, to re-rate, and none is scheduled before December.
Persistency on x, Volatility on y, oldest faint to newest bright. Q1 volatile trend, Q2 volatile chop, Q3 quiet range, Q4 quiet drift. The path runs almost entirely along the top and bottom of the right half: Persistency has stayed positive throughout while Volatility swings — the vertical-run behaviour expected of a slow Persistency series. Source: Trader workbook, Individual regimes daily. As of 31 Aug 2026 — 1 trading day behind the report date.
| Measure | Current | Mean | Std dev | Min | Max | Percentile | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persistency | +0.0385 | 0.1121 | 0.0351 | 0.0283 | 0.1435 | 2.4 | Random / Neutral — trending character at a 14-month low |
| Volatility | −0.0138 | 0.0017 | 0.2891 | −0.4966 | 0.5000 | 48.6 | Normal Vol — mid-range; the 31 Aug gap will lift the next read |
Currently in Q4 “quiet drift”, held 3 consecutive periods. Both readings sit within 0.05 of an axis, so the quadrant call is borderline and provisional — SAIC is effectively at the origin of the map. Correlations, exponents and betas are never coloured; only signed values with valence are.
| Quadrant | Label | % of period |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Volatile trend | 50.3 |
| Q2 | Volatile chop | 0.0 |
| Q3 | Quiet range | 0.0 |
| Q4 | Quiet drift | 49.7 |
| Transition | Count | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 → Q4 | 9 | volatility falls, trend intact |
| Q4 → Q1 | 8 | volatility rises, trend intact |
SAIC has spent the entire 14-month daily history in only two quadrants — Q1 and Q4 — because Persistency never turned negative; all 17 transitions are vertical volatility flips. The series updates far less often than Volatility and can hold one value for weeks. That is the data behaving normally. These statistics describe the stated window and are not predictions.
| Driver | Correlation | R² (%) | Rolling 60d | Rolling min | Rolling max | Stability | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Driver 1 Primary | 0.011 | 0.0 | 0.036 | −0.303 | 0.375 | Variable | Neutral |
| Market Driver 2 | 0.055 | 0.3 | 0.127 | −0.064 | 0.186 | Stable | Positive |
| Market Driver 3 | −0.019 | 0.0 | −0.315 | −0.319 | 0.167 | Variable | Neutral |
| Market Driver 4 | −0.028 | 0.1 | 0.148 | −0.528 | 0.373 | Variable | Neutral |
| Market Driver 5 | −0.024 | 0.1 | −0.201 | −0.419 | 0.435 | Variable | Neutral |
| Sector Driver 1 Primary | −0.073 | 0.5 | 0.103 | −0.301 | 0.308 | Variable | Negative |
| Sector Driver 2 | 0.074 | 0.5 | −0.293 | −0.337 | 0.365 | Variable | Positive |
| Sector Driver 3 | −0.008 | 0.0 | −0.018 | −0.264 | 0.228 | Variable | Neutral |
Market Drivers 1–5 then Sector Drivers 1–3. Daily log returns vs first-differenced Market Driver levels and return-scaled Sector Driver values, 499 observations. Every correlation is near zero and none is stable — there is no persistent factor link to trade. Correlations are never coloured. Drivers as of 31 Aug 2026 — 1 trading day behind the report date.
| Driver | Raw beta | Standardised beta | Share of explained variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Driver 1 (primary) | 0.00003 | 0.018 | 0.0% |
| Sector Driver 1 (primary) | −0.05359 | −0.075 | 0.5% |
The systematic sliver is 0.6% (Market Driver 1 + Sector Driver 1); the bar's left edge is drawn slightly wide for legibility.
This is neither a beta vehicle nor a sector proxy — it is an almost purely idiosyncratic name. Over 99% of SAIC's daily variance is unexplained by the market and sector drivers, which means the company, not the index, decides the next month: contract awards, bookings and the post-earnings tape will move the stock, and a broad-market hedge would have done almost nothing to offset it.
Market Driver 1 (solid) and Sector Driver 1 (dashed) against SAIC's daily returns. Both oscillate around zero across the whole window and cross repeatedly — the current readings (+0.04 and +0.10) are as uninformative as the average. No inversion or regime in the linkage; the independence is structural, not a passing phase.
SAIC's daily returns conditioned on each group's regime, 4 Sep 2024 – 31 Aug 2026 (499 sessions). Every group is named, never its proxy ticker. Conditional statistics describe the stated window and are not forecasts — and with 99% idiosyncratic variance, the conditioning is weak by construction.
| Market regime | Days | % of period | Cumulative return | Ann. return | Ann. vol | Sharpe | Hit rate | Best day | Worst day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatile trend | 97 | 19.4 | +22.1% | +67.9% | 30.5 | 2.22 | 57.7 | +9.93 | −4.15 |
| Volatile chop | 175 | 35.1 | +10.3% | +15.2% | 43.8 | 0.35 | 50.3 | +15.09 | −16.17 |
| Quiet range | 119 | 23.8 | −16.2% | −31.3% | 41.0 | −0.76 | 53.8 | +5.76 | −17.48 |
| Quiet drift | 108 | 21.6 | −11.3% | −24.4% | 30.6 | −0.80 | 48.1 | +5.07 | −7.17 |
The US market is in Volatile Trend today — historically SAIC's best US-market bucket (+22.1% cumulative over 97 days, Sharpe 2.22). Read as description, not signal.
| Market regime | Days | % of period | Cumulative return | Ann. return | Ann. vol | Sharpe | Hit rate | Best day | Worst day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatile trend | 97 | 19.4 | +34.3% | +115.3% | 32.4 | 3.55 | 55.7 | +9.93 | −4.58 |
| Quiet range | 150 | 30.1 | +6.5% | +11.2% | 43.1 | 0.26 | 54.0 | +15.09 | −17.48 |
| Volatile chop | 182 | 36.5 | −6.3% | −8.6% | 38.8 | −0.22 | 51.6 | +8.52 | −16.17 |
| Quiet drift | 70 | 14.0 | −25.4% | −65.1% | 31.4 | −2.07 | 44.3 | +3.63 | −7.17 |
Same pattern as the broad market, sharper: SAIC's best days have clustered when the SP500 itself trends with volatility.
| Market regime | Days | % of period | Cumulative return | Ann. return | Ann. vol | Sharpe | Hit rate | Best day | Worst day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatile trend Small sample | 33 | 6.6 | +20.2% | +307.7% | 36.9 | 8.33 | 60.6 | +9.93 | −3.89 |
| Volatile chop | 231 | 46.3 | +9.0% | +9.9% | 32.8 | 0.30 | 53.2 | +6.91 | −14.22 |
| Quiet range | 235 | 47.1 | −23.6% | −25.1% | 42.8 | −0.59 | 49.8 | +15.09 | −17.48 |
The global market sits in Volatile Chop, where SAIC's history is a modest +9.0% cumulative (Sharpe 0.30). The +307.7% annualised in the 33-day Volatile-Trend bucket is a small-sample artefact — the +20.2% cumulative is the honest figure.
| Group | Current regime | Best regime | Worst regime | Cum. return in current | Sharpe in current | Sharpe spread | Days in current |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US market | Volatile trend | Volatile trend | Quiet drift | +22.1% | 2.22 | 3.02 | 97 |
| SP500 | Volatile trend | Volatile trend | Quiet drift | +34.3% | 3.55 | 5.62 | 97 |
| Global market | Volatile chop | Volatile trend | Quiet range | +9.0% | 0.30 | 8.92 | 231 |
| Technology | Quiet range | Volatile chop | Quiet drift | +1.4% | 0.05 | 2.24 | 180 |
| Financials | Quiet drift | Quiet drift | Volatile chop | +23.4% | 6.50 | 7.06 | 44 |
| Energy | Volatile trend | Volatile trend | Volatile chop | +30.3% | 2.98 | 3.38 | 104 |
| Utilities | Volatile chop | Volatile chop | Quiet drift | +23.3% | 1.79 | 2.91 | 135 |
| Europe | Quiet drift | Quiet drift | Volatile trend | +24.0% | 1.91 | 2.71 | 125 |
| Gold | Volatile chop | Quiet range | Volatile chop | −23.3% | −0.38 | 3.90 | 399 |
| VIX Near | Quiet drift | Quiet range | Quiet drift | −11.0% | −1.81 | 2.56 | 47 |
| VIX Mid | Quiet drift | Volatile trend | Quiet range | +14.4% | 0.96 | 3.56 | 120 |
| Bonds near | Quiet range | Volatile chop | Volatile trend | −28.4% | −0.69 | 5.00 | 231 |
| Bonds mid | Quiet range | Volatile chop | Volatile trend | −6.1% | −0.15 | 4.04 | 266 |
| Bonds long | Quiet range | Volatile trend | Quiet drift | −22.2% | −0.39 | 6.34 | 355 |
Cumulative return and Sharpe are SAIC's outcome while each group has been in its current regime, over the 499-session window. Coloured only where the sign carries valence.
Regime-conditional history describes 4 Sep 2024 – 31 Aug 2026, not the future. The Global-market Volatile-Trend bucket holds 33 days and its annualised figure should be ignored. Market-regime series as of 31 Aug 2026 — 1 trading day behind the report date.
| Date | Headline | Sentiment |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 26 | Q2 FY27 beat & raise; FY27 guide lifted to $7.2–7.3B / $10.65–10.75 adj. EPS | Positive |
| 31 Aug 26 | Zacks: +33.8% EPS surprise; Rank #2 (Buy) reiterated | Positive |
| 31 Aug 26 | Stock spikes to all-time high $142.66 intraday, then fades to close +1.8% | Mixed |
| 28 Aug 26 | Fresh 52-week high $130.53; +28% YTD into the print | Positive |
| 19 Aug 26 | Jefferies raises target to $130 from $115 | Positive |
| 17 Feb 26 | Jim Reagan named permanent CEO after interim tenure | Positive |
| 11 Feb 26 | Preliminary Q4 warning: procurement delays, FY27 organic decline; shares −16% | Negative |
| 16 Dec 25 | CEO, CFO and an EVP buy stock on the open market near $100 | Positive |
| 4 Dec 25 | Q3 FY26 tops estimates; shares +16% | Positive |
| 6 Oct 25 | Agrees to acquire SilverEdge Government Solutions for $205M | Positive |
| Oct 25 | CEO Toni Townes-Whitley departs after two years | Negative |
| 4 Sep 25 | Q2 FY26 revenue declines, guidance cut; shares −10% | Negative |
Newest first. The narrative has swung from a February growth scare and a leadership vacuum to a settled CEO and two consecutive beat-and-raises — the stock has re-rated with it, which is precisely why the bar into the next quarter is now higher.
| Field | Science Applications International Corp. | Peer context |
|---|---|---|
| Legal name | Science Applications International Corporation | — |
| Exchange / IPO | NASDAQ: SAIC / listed 16 Sep 2013 | peers on NYSE |
| Domicile | Reston, Virginia, USA | same DC-metro cluster as LDOS, CACI, BAH |
| Sector / industry | Information Technology / IT & defence services (SIC 7373) | — |
| Market cap | $5.42B | smallest of the four (LDOS $17.6B, CACI $13.8B, BAH $9.1B) |
| Employees | ~23,000 | smallest headcount of the group |
| TTM revenue | $7.40B | vs LDOS $17.6B, BAH $11.1B, CACI $9.6B |
| Revenue model | Cost-plus, T&M and fixed-price service contracts; ~all U.S. federal | Defense & Intelligence ~77%, Civilian ~23% |
| Key differentiators | Entrenched defence/intel systems integrator; digital engineering, C4ISR, mission IT, enterprise IT | scale-disadvantaged but focused |
| CIK | 0001571123 | — |
| Website | saic.com | — |
SAIC did what bulls asked — beat and raised — and the market handed the gains straight back, printing a record $142.66 before closing +1.8%. The evidence favours neither a clean breakout nor a breakdown over the window: a cheap 12× multiple, a lifted EPS guide, buybacks and insider conviction support dips, while a failed breakout, an above-target price, a Hold-heavy Street and a sub-1 book-to-bill cap chases — and with 99% idiosyncratic variance the next move is a company story, not a market one. The single condition that flips it bullish is post-release target hikes dragging consensus up through $128 while price holds the $126–128 zone; it flips bearish on a fill of the 31 Aug gap toward $118 or a 30 September federal-funding disruption.